I Informational Interpretation of quantum mechanics?

Mgt3
Messages
83
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
What is the "Informational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics"?
I heard something today about the "informational interpretation" of quantum mechanics and a phrase used was "it from bit." Is there actually such a thing? What does it mean, and how is it distinguished from other interpretations like MWI or Copenhagen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mgt3 said:
I heard something today ...
Here on PF that has as much value as a citation as does "some guy on a bus told me that ... "

In other words, we like specific citations.
 
Agreed, this is a poor thread start. @Mgt3 please start a new thread in the Interpretations forum and include links to your reading. This attempted thread start is locked.
 

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum behaviour of an electron around a positively charged sphere'

If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
View full post »

Thread 'Does a qubit break interference in the double slit experiment?'

According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
View full post »

Similar threads

I A thought experiment concerning determinism in quantum mechanics
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Energy and momentum in quantum mechanics
Replies
8
Views
1K
I Is this a valid quantum Cheshire cat?
Replies
13
Views
2K
B Definition of a random variable in quantum mechanics?
Replies
12
Views
2K
I Lagrangian Mechanics, Continuous Particle Paths and QFT
Replies
6
Views
1K
A Multiparticle Relativistic Quantum Mechanics in an external potential
Replies
22
Views
3K
I Quantum Mechanics as a Probabilistic forecast of reality
Replies
21
Views
2K
I Are there any accepted relativistic interpretations of quantum mechanics?
Replies
45
Views
6K
I States and observables in quantum mechanics
Replies
5
Views
874
B Is there another workable interpretation of the Bell Inequality?
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top