I Inner products with spherical harmonics in quantum mechanics

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the inner product of spherical harmonics with the cosine operator in quantum mechanics, specifically the expression ⟨l,m|cos(θ)|l,m'⟩. It is established that this inner product equals zero when l is the same, due to parity considerations, as cos(θ) has opposite parity to the spherical harmonics Y_l^m. The Wigner-Eckart theorem is mentioned as a method to evaluate these matrix elements, emphasizing the importance of spherical harmonics' orthogonality. The integral vanishes because the integrand is antisymmetric under the transformation θ → π - θ, leading to the conclusion that the integral over the defined limits results in zero. The conversation concludes with a confirmation that the integral can be rewritten to demonstrate the odd function property, reinforcing the earlier findings.
Salmone
Messages
101
Reaction score
13
Let ##|l,m\rangle## be a simultaneous eigenstate of operators ##L^2## and ##L_z## and we want to calculate ##\langle l,m|cos(\theta)|l,m'\rangle## where ##\theta## is the angle ##[0,\pi]##. It is true that in general ##\langle l,m|cos(\theta)|l,m'\rangle=0## ##(1)## for the same ##l## even if m's are equal? Why?

For example ##\langle1,0|cos(\theta)|1,0\rangle= \int_{}^{} (Y_1^0)^{*}cos(\theta)Y_1^0 \,d\Omega ## is this zero? Does the fact that equation (1) applies have anything to do with parity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Salmone said:
we want to calculate ##\langle l,m|cos(\theta)|l,m'\rangle## where ##\theta## is the angle ##[0,\pi]##.
What does this even mean? ##\cos(\theta)## isn't an operator.
 
Of course ##\cos \theta## is an operator. The trick to get the matrix elements wrt. the angular-momentum eigenstates is to use the socalled Wigner Eckart theorem to evaluate matrix elements of tensor-operator components. In your case you have ##z=r \cos \theta##, i.e., you can evaluate the corresponding expectation values considering the position-vector components ##\vec{x}##, using the Wigner-Eckart theorem.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner–Eckart_theorem
 
  • Like
Likes protonsarecool
It isn't an operator in the form in which the OP used it, i.e. on abstract vectors in Hilbert space.

To calculate the integral in the OP I would write ##\cos\theta## in terms of spherical harmonics. Then you can look up an expansion for the product of two spherical harmonics in terms of a sum of single spherical harmonics (involves Wigner 3j -symbols which you'll need to understand the properties of). From there you can compute the integral using the orthogonality of spherical harmonics.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
That's of course another possibility and equivalent with the use of the Wigner-Eckart theorem :-).
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone
Thank you for all your answers, I'd like to know how to say instantly that ##\langle lm|cos(\theta)|lm'\rangle=0## using the parity where ##|lm\rangle=Y_l^m(\theta,\phi)##. Is there a way to prove it? By "using parity" I mean something like: spherical harmonics parity is equal to ##(-1)^lY_l^m## and ##cos(\pi-\theta)=-cos(\theta)##
 
Since ##\cos \theta=z/r## the parity of this operator is ##(-1)##, because the position vector is a polar vector and ##r=|\vec{x}|## is a scalar. Thus the parity of ##\cos \theta Y_{l}^m## is ##(-1)^{l+1}##. Since the spherical harmonics are parity eigenstates, the matrix element is the same ##l## must vanish (or with different ##l## of the same parity, i.e., with both ##l## even or both odd).
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone
@vanhees71 I can't get the last passage, why the matrix element in the same ##l## must vanish? If possible, could you be more explicit please?
 
Obviously ##\cos \theta Y_{l}^m(\theta,\phi)## has the opposite parity than ##Y_{l}^{m'}(\theta,\phi)##. That implies that the integrand in the integral of the matrix element is antisymmetric under ##\theta \rightarrow \pi-\theta##, which makes the integral over ##\theta \in [0,\pi]## vanish.

Indeed if ##f(\theta)=-f(\pi-\theta)## you have on the one hand
$$I=\int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \theta \sin \theta f(\theta).$$
Now substitute ##\theta'=\pi-\theta##
$$I=\int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \theta' \sin(\pi-\theta') f(\pi-\theta').$$
Now ##\sin(\pi-\theta')=\sin \theta'## and by assumption ##f(\pi-\theta')=-f(\theta')##, i.e.,
$$I=-\int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \theta' \sin \theta' f(\theta')=-I \; \Rightarrow \; I=0.$$
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen and Salmone
  • #10
Salmone said:
For example ##\langle L,0|cos(\theta)L,0\rangle= \int_{}^{} (Y_L^0)^{*}cos(\theta)Y_L^0 \,d\Omega ## is this zero?
It's just simple integration. After the substitution ##z=\cos\theta##, the integral becomes ##\int_{-1}^{+1}dz## of an odd function of z which vanishes.
 
  • Like
Likes gentzen, vanhees71 and Salmone
  • #11
The scalar product for functions on the unit sphere is defined by
$$\langle f|g \rangle=\int_0^{\pi} \mathrm{d} \theta \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \phi \sin \theta f^*(\theta,\phi) g(\theta,\phi).$$
In my calculation
$$f(\theta)=Y_l^{m*}(\theta,\varphi) Y_l^{m'}(\theta,\varphi) \cos \theta.$$
The integral over ##\theta## alone makes the integral vanish, no matter what the ##\phi## dependence is. The ##\sin \theta## must be in the integral because of the definition of the scalar product for ##\mathrm{L}^2(\Omega)##, where ##\Omega## is the unit sphere in ##\mathbb{R}^3##.
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone
  • #12
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #13
One last thing, is it possible to write the integral as ##\int_{-1}^{1} \mathrm{d} cos\theta \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \phi f^*(\theta,\phi) g(\theta,\phi)## so that I'm integrating from ##-1## to ##1## an odd function?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #14
Sure. Just substitute ##u=\cos \theta##. Then ##\mathrm{d} u =-\mathrm{d} \theta \sin \theta## and thus
$$\langle f|g \rangle = \int_{-1}^1 \mathrm{d} u \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \phi f^* g,$$
where I wrote in a somewhat sloppy notation.
 
  • Like
Likes Salmone