Integrated Boltzman equation for dark matter

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karlzr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Integrated Boltzmann equation for dark matter as presented in Dodelson's book. The equation describes the scattering process between particles and highlights the significance of equilibrium number densities, denoted as ##n^{\text{eq}}_i##. Participants question the validity of assuming equilibrium when chemical potentials are non-zero and the implications for coannihilation scenarios in dark matter interactions. Clarifications are sought regarding the conditions under which the equation holds true, particularly when considering particles that are not in equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Boltzmann equation and its applications in cosmology.
  • Familiarity with dark matter interactions and coannihilation processes.
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics, particularly the concepts of equilibrium and chemical potential.
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation used in particle physics, including scattering cross-sections and number densities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Boltzmann equation in cosmological contexts.
  • Research the role of chemical potentials in equilibrium and non-equilibrium systems.
  • Examine coannihilation processes in dark matter models, focusing on relevant literature such as hep-ph/9704361.
  • Explore the concept of equilibrium number densities and their calculation in various particle physics scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focused on cosmology and dark matter, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of particle interactions and the Boltzmann equation.

karlzr
Messages
129
Reaction score
2
In Dodelson's book, the equation for a scattering process ## a + b \Leftrightarrow c + d ## is given as
##a^{-3} \frac{ d (n_a a^3)}{d t}=-n^{\text{eq}}_a n^{\text{eq}}_b<\sigma v>(\frac{n_a n_b}{n^{\text{eq}}_a n^{\text{eq}}_b} - \frac{n_c n_d}{n^{\text{eq}}_c n^{\text{eq}}_d}) = - <\sigma v>(n_a n_b - \frac{n^{\text{eq}}_a n^{\text{eq}}_b}{n^{\text{eq}}_c n^{\text{eq}}_d}n_c n_d)##
with ##n_i = g_i e^{\mu_i/T}\int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}e^{-E_i/T}## and the equilibrium number density ##n^{\text{eq}}_i = g_i \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^3}e^{-E_i/T}##.
(1)Why is this ##n^{\text{eq}}_i## the equilibrum number density since we don't necessarily have ##\mu=0## in equilibrium: ##n_i=n^{\text{eq}}_i## ?
(2) In papers about dark matter, it is very often to see ## a^{-3} \frac{ d (n_a a^3)}{d t}=-<\sigma v>(n_a n_b - n^{\text{eq}}_a n^{\text{eq}}_b) ##. This is true only if both ##c## and ##d## are in equilibrium, right? I have this question because in coannihilation dark matter hep-ph/9704361, the contribution from ##\chi_i + X \Leftrightarrow \chi_j + Y## is said to be ##\propto (n_i n_X - n^{\text{eq}}_i n^{\text{eq}}_X)## when both ##\chi_i## and ##\chi_j## are freezing out. I don't get it because ##\chi_j## isn't in equilibrium.
 
Still need help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K