Integrating Symmetric Definite Integrals: A Trick for Evaluating $U_n-U_{n-1}$

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the difference between two symmetric definite integrals, specifically $U_n - U_{n-1}$, where $U_n = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin^2(nx)}{\sin^2x}\,dx$. The participants derive that $U_n - U_{n-1} = \frac{\pi}{2}$, leading to the conclusion that $U_n = \frac{n\pi}{2}$. The introduction of $T_n = \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin((2n+1)x)}{\sin x}dx$ is highlighted as a key step in simplifying the evaluation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of definite integrals and their properties
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities, particularly sine functions
  • Knowledge of integral calculus techniques, including symmetry in integrals
  • Experience with evaluating integrals involving sine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric definite integrals in calculus
  • Learn advanced techniques for evaluating integrals, including the residue theorem
  • Explore trigonometric identities and their applications in integral calculus
  • Investigate the use of substitution methods in evaluating complex integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in advanced integral evaluation techniques, particularly those involving trigonometric functions.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Attempt:
If $\displaystyle U_n=\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin^2(nx)}{\sin^2x}\,dx$, then find $U_n-U_{n-1}$.

Attempt:
$$U_n=\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin^2(nx)}{\sin^2x}\,dx$$
$$U_{n-1}=\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin^2((n-1)x)}{\sin^2x}\,dx$$
$$\Rightarrow U_n-U_{n-1}=\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{(\sin(nx)-\sin((n-1)x)(\sin(nx)+\sin(n-1)x)}{\sin^2x}\,dx$$
I write the following:
$$\sin(nx)-\sin((n-1)x=2\cos\left(\frac{2n-1}{2}x\right)\sin\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)$$
$$\sin(nx)+\sin((n-1)x=2\sin\left(\frac{2n-1}{2}x\right)\cos\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)$$
The product of above can be written as follows:
$$(\sin(nx)-\sin((n-1)x)(\sin(nx)+\sin((n-1)x)=\sin(x)\sin((2n-1)x)$$
Hence,
$$U_n-U_{n-1}=\int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin((2n-1)x)}{\sin x}\,\,dx$$
I am not sure how to proceed after this. I tried writing $\sin((2n-1)x)=\sin(2nx)\cos(x)-\sin(x)\cos(2nx)$ but that doesn't seem to help. :(

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let $$T_n=\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{\sin((2n+1)x)}{\sin x}dx$$

Then $$
\begin{align*}
T_n-T_{n-1} &= \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin((2n+1)x)-\sin((2n-1)x)}{\sin x}dx \\
&= 2 \int_0^{\pi/2}\cos(2nx)\; dx \\
&= \frac{1}{n}\sin(n\pi) \\
&= 0
\end{align*}
$$

So $$T_n=T_{n-1}=T_{n-2}=\cdots =T_0 = \int_0^{\pi/2}dx=\frac{\pi}{2}$$

Then using the last equation of your post we get $$U_{n}-U_{n-1}=T_{n-1}=\frac{\pi}{2}$$

And from here you can also deduce that $$U_n=\frac{n\pi}{2}$$.
 
Last edited:
Shobhit said:
Let $$T_n=\int_0^{\pi/2}\frac{\sin((2n+1)x)}{\sin x}dx$$

Then $$
\begin{align*}
T_n-T_{n-1} &= \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{\sin((2n+1)x)-\sin((2n-1)x)}{\sin x}dx \\
&= 2 \int_0^{\pi/2}\cos(2nx)\; dx \\
&= \frac{1}{n}\sin(n\pi) \\
&= 0
\end{align*}
$$

So $$T_n=T_{n-1}=T_{n-2}=\cdots =T_0 = \int_0^{\pi/2}dx=\frac{\pi}{2}$$

Thus $$U_{n}-U_{n-1}=T_{n-1}=\frac{\pi}{2}$$

And from here you can also deduce that $$U_n=\frac{n\pi}{2}$$.

Thanks Shobhit! :)

Can I have some insight about how did you think of defining $T_n$? Is there no way to evaluate the definite integral I got or is there any alternative solution?
 
Pranav said:
Thanks Shobhit! :)

Can I have some insight about how did you think of defining $T_n$? Is there no way to evaluate the definite integral I got?

The integral at the end of your post is actually $T_{n-1}$.

Pranav said:
Is there any alternative solution?

I know another solution using the residue theorem but I think that would be too hard for you to understand and probably not appropriate for the calculus section. :)
 
Last edited:
Shobhit said:
The integral at the end of your post is actually $T_{n-1}$.
Yes, I know about that but I am more interested to know how did you think of $T_n$? Is this some kind of routine problem? :confused:
 
Pranav said:
Yes, I know about that but I am more interested to know how did you think of $T_n$? Is this some kind of routine problem? :confused:

Over the years I have gained a lot of experience in evaluating definite integrals. So that's why I knew which trick can be applied here. The reason behind that particular definition of $T_n$ is the symmetry of the integral.
 
Shobhit said:
Over the years I have gained a lot of experience in evaluating definite integrals. So that's why I knew which trick can be applied here. The reason behind that particular definition of $T_n$ is the symmetry of the integral.

Thanks Shobhit! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K