MHB Interval for the defined solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I have to find the solution of the problem $$u_t(x,t)+u_x(x,t)=\frac{2x}{1+(x-t)^2}u^2(x,t), x \in \mathbb{R}, t>0 \\ u(x,0)=1, x \in \mathbb{R}$$

I found that the solution is $$u(x, t)=\frac{1+x^2-2xt+t^2}{x^2-4xt+2t^2+1}$$

Now we have to look for which values this solution is defined.

$$2t^2-4xt+(x^2+1)=0 \\ \Delta=8(x^2-1) \\ t_{1,2}=x\pm \sqrt{\frac{x^2-1}{2}}$$

  • When $\Delta<0 \Rightarrow |x|<1$, $x^2-4xt+2t^2+1=0$ has no roots. So, the solution is defined for $t \geq 0$.
  • When $\Delta=0 \Rightarrow x=\pm 1$ the solution is defined $\forall t \geq 0$ with $t \neq 1$.
  • When $\Delta>0 \Rightarrow |x| >1 \Rightarrow x>1 \text{ or } x <-1$. For $x<-1$ the solution is defined $\forall t \geq 0$ and for $x>1$ the solution is defined $\forall t \geq 0$ with $t \neq x\pm \sqrt{\frac{x^2-1}{2}}$.

Is this correct?? (Wondering)

Because in my notes there is the following solution:

For $-1<x<1$ the solution is defined $\forall t>0$, for $x \leq -1$ the solution is defined $\forall t \geq 0$, but for $x \geq 1$ the solution is defined for $0 \leq t \leq x-\sqrt{\frac{x^2-1}{2}}$.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi! (Smile)

I agree with your analysis. (Nod)

Then, perhaps they want the domain of the solution where it is continuous, which would exclude the part at the other side of the hyperbola.
Still, in that case we should also have the part for $x \geq 1$ with $t > x+\sqrt{\frac{x^2-1}{2}}$. (Thinking)
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K