There is plenty of stuff explaining the Bohr model eg:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_model
But, yes if looked at carefully it is confusing.
That's because these early models were not really correct and it shows up if you push it too far.
The situation was very chaotic with all sorts of ad-hoc rules invented by Summerfeld and others to try and save the situation. It failed. A breakthrough was required. That came when Schroedinger and Heisenberg developed two very different formulations that fixed it up - wave mechanics and matrix mechanics respectively. And although not usually mentioned a guy called Dirac also had one that was much more elegant based on what's called q numbers. Three separate theories - not good. Then Dirac developed what was known as the transformation theory that tied them all together and was very elegant. Its basically what we call QM today.
That being the case the stuff you are talking about is basically of historical interest. My advice is forget about it. Study the conceptual core of QM:
http://www.scottaaronson.com/democritus/lec9.html
Once you have digested that do a separate post and myself and others can explain how that conceptual core explains the hydrogen atom. But basically, its a surprising fact, that only comes out with advanced math, if we want those probabilities to not depend on our coordinate system then this leads to the Schroedinger equation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger_equation
And when you apply it to the Hydrogen atom low and behold it explains all those funny things the Bohr model had trouble with such as exactly why it only had certain energies:
http://www.ciul.ul.pt/~ananunes/QM/Laguerres&Hydrogenatom.pdf
Don't be worried if the math beats you - simply try to get the gist.
Thanks
Bill