Inverse of Function: Topology by Munkres Ch 1

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter trixitium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of inverse functions as presented in Chapter 1 of "Topology" by James Munkres. It clarifies that while a function f must be bijective for its inverse to satisfy certain properties, the notation f^{-1}(B_0) remains meaningful even when f is not injective or surjective. The participants emphasize that the definitions of f(A) and f^{-1}(B) are valid regardless of the bijectiveness of f, illustrated through examples such as f(x) = x². This highlights common misunderstandings surrounding inverse functions in topology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bijective functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with set theory and notation
  • Basic knowledge of functions and their inverses
  • Concept of injective and surjective mappings
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of bijective functions in detail
  • Learn about injective and surjective functions with practical examples
  • Explore set theory concepts related to function mappings
  • Investigate the implications of non-bijective functions in topology
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying topology, educators teaching function theory, and anyone seeking to clarify the concept of inverse functions in mathematical contexts.

trixitium
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm reading the first chapter of Topology by Munkres. There we can see:

"if f is bijective, there exists a function from B to A called the inverse of f.

(...)

As another situation where care is needed, we note that it is not in general true that

f^{-1}(f(A_0) = A_0 and f(f^{-1}(B_0)) = B_0. The relevant rules, which we leave you to check, are the following: If f: A \rightarrow B and A_0 \subset A and B_0 \subset B, then

A_0 \subset f^{-1}(f(A_0)) and f(f^{-1}(B_0) \subset B_0

The first inclusion is equality if f is injective and the second inclusion is equality if f is surjective."

Are there any sense in talking about inverse considering that f is not injective or surjective?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, this is a common misunderstanding, due to a notation issue. If f : A \rightarrow B is any function and B_0 \subset B, then by f^{-1}(B_0) people always mean the set \{ x \in A | f(x) \in B_0 \}. Notice that this has meaning even if f is not a bijection. Likewise, if A_0 \subset A, we have f(A) = \{ f(x) | x \in A \}. I think that with these definitions you should be able to understand the conclusions made in your book.
 
Oh, dear, oh, dear! Just seeing this question makes me want to hide under the bed!

The very first time I had to give an explanation of a proof to a class in a topology class, it involved f^{-1}(A) for A a set and I did the whole thing assuming f was invertible!

If f is a function from set X to set Y, and A is a subset of X, B a subset of Y, then we define f(A) to be the set of all y in Y such that f(x)= y for some x in A and f^{-1}(B) to be the set of all x in X such that f(x) is in B.

IF f is "one to one and onto", that is, if f is invertibe, then we can show that f^{-1}(f(A))= A, but f does not have to be invertible, or even defined on set B for f^{-1}(B) to be defined.

For example, let f:R=>R be defined by f(x)= x2 and let B= [-4, 4]. Then f^{-1}(B)= [-2, 2]. f(2)= f(-2)= 4 so both 2 and -2 are in f^{-1}(B) and for any x between -2 and 2, -4< 0< f(x)< 4, so x is also in f^{-1}(B). If x< -2 or x> 2, f(x)> 4 so not in [-4, 4].

Even f^{-1}([-4, -1]) is defined. Because there is NO x such that f(x)= x^2 is in [-4, -1] so f^{-1}([-4, -1]) is the empty set.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K