Explore Irrational Exponents: {e^(2ki)|k=intiger}

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eczeno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents Irrational
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical exploration of the set {e^(2ki)|k∈ℤ}, specifically regarding its density on the complex unit circle. Participants assert that these numbers, when raised to the power of π, yield 1, and they discuss the implications of this property. A key insight is the equivalence of the conjecture to the density of the set 2ℤ + 2πℤ in the reals, which can be proven using the homeomorphism between ℝ/2πℤ and S¹. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of proving that ℤ + rℤ is dense in ℝ for any irrational r.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and the complex unit circle
  • Familiarity with the concept of density in mathematical sets
  • Knowledge of homeomorphisms and continuous mappings
  • Basic understanding of irrational numbers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Prove that ℤ + rℤ is dense in ℝ for any irrational number r
  • Explore the implications of the homeomorphism ℝ/2πℤ → S¹ in topology
  • Investigate the properties of the exponential function in complex analysis
  • Study the concept of discontinuities in mathematical functions and their impact on density
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of irrational exponents and their implications on density in mathematical sets.

eczeno
Messages
242
Reaction score
0
I am playing around with the set {e^(2ki)|k=intiger}. all of these numbers when raised to the pi power give one (at least as one possible value). In other words, they can all be thought of as values of 1^(1/pi). There are a countable infinity of them, and I believe that these numbers are dense on the complex unit circle, but I am having a hard time thinking of how, even to begin, to show that. any thoughts on that, or this set in general?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi eczeno! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a pi: π and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

one way would be to assume that they aren't dense, so there's an interval which has none of them, and to prove that that's impossible :wink:
 
hi tim,

thanks for the reply.

that is an idea i have considered. it is probably a good way to go, but i guess my real problem is trying to state an assumption like that in a rigorous way. the way i have presented the set above is a bit of a cheat. for all values of k where |k|>1 the argument lies outside of the interval (-pi,pi]. any attempt to restrict the domain introduces a discontinuity somewhere on the circle and i don't know how to talk about density on an interval that contains a discontinuity.

well, if nothing else, the problem has become a littler clearer to me.
 
Hint: \mathbb{Z}+2\pi \mathbb{Z} is dense in \mathbb{R}.
 
:smile:

thanks landau. if i am understanding you correctly my conjecture is equivalent to:

2Z+2piZ is dense in the reals and so it is dense in any subset of the reals, such as (-pi,pi].

now all i have to do is prove your hint is true :smile: .
 
Proving my hint is the most work. Once you've done that, use the homeomorphism
\mathbb{R}/2\pi \mathbb{Z}\to S^1
and the fact that a surjective continuous map sends a dense set to a dense set.

To prove my hint, prove the generalized statement:
\mathbb{Z}+r\mathbb{Z} is dense in \mathbb{R},
where r is any irrational number.
 
thanks again landau. this is exactly the kind of help i was looking for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K