Irreducible Components in a Primary Decomposition

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
ircdan
Messages
229
Reaction score
0
Let R be a Noetherian Ring and I an ideal in R.

Let I = Q_1 n ... n Q_r = J_1 n ... n J_r be two primary decompositions of I.

How can I show the number of irreducible components in each decomposition is the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly you shoulnd't have r on both sides of that equality. Secondly, you will need to know the definition of 'primary'. So what is it? What does it imply? Does this seem familiar to any other result you know? Is the result even true? (i.e. think about what a counter example might be and see where it fails to satisfy some hypothesis.)
 
matt grime said:
Firstly you shoulnd't have r on both sides of that equality. Secondly, you will need to know the definition of 'primary'. So what is it? What does it imply? Does this seem familiar to any other result you know? Is the result even true? (i.e. think about what a counter example might be and see where it fails to satisfy some hypothesis.)

Matt, thank you very much for your reply. Yes the result is true. I'm assuming all uniqueness theorems found in say, Dummit and Foote. I figured it would be easier to prove with some theory in place, hence why I have r on both sides. Whether I need this or not I don't know, but I figured it might make things easier.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
The point was that by writing r on both sides you were assuming the result you wanted to show. And you haven't written out the definition of primary/prime and what it implies in a Noetherian ring. The result will be deducible from the definitions, so what are the definitions? I gave you plenty of help and you ignored it all.