MHB Is 2√(7)+4 an Irrational Number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational
nycfunction
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
See picture for question and answer.
 

Attachments

  • MathMagic190527_1.png
    MathMagic190527_1.png
    11.5 KB · Views: 105
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What, exactly, do you mean by "continued decimal number"? If you mean simply that it is not a terminating decimal, a rational number such as 1/3 has that property. That's not the reason $2\sqrt{7}+ 4$ is irrational.
First, the rational numbers are "closed under subtraction and division" so if $x= 2\sqrt{7}+ 4$ were rational so would be $\sqrt{7}= (x- 4)/2$. And if $\sqrt{7}$ were rational then there would exist integers, a and b, with no common factors, such that $\sqrt{7}= \frac{a}{b}$. From that $7= \frac{a^2}{b^2}$ and $a^2= 7b^2$. That is, $a^2$ has a factor of 7 and, since 7 is a prime number, a has a factor of 7. a= 7n for some integer n so $a^2= 49n^2= 7b^2$. Then $b^2= 7n^2$ so, as before, b has a factor of 7, contradicting the fact that a and b has no factors in common.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
What, exactly, do you mean by "continued decimal number"? If you mean simply that it is not a terminating decimal, a rational number such as 1/3 has that property. That's not the reason 2\sqrt{7}+ 4 is irrational.

First, the rational numbers are "closed under subtraction and division" so if x= 2\sqrt{7}+ 4 were rational so would be \sqrt{7}= (x- 4)/2. And if \sqrt{7} were rational then there would exist integers, a and b, with no common factors, such that \sqrt{7}= \frac{a}{b}. From that 7= \frac{a^2}{b^2} and a^2= 7b^2. That is, a^2 has a factor of 7 and, since 7 is a prime number, a has a factor of 7. a= 7n for some integer n so a^2= 49n^2= 7b^2. Then b^2= 7n^2 so, as before, b has a factor of 7, contradicting the fact that a and b has no factors in common.

See attachment.
 

Attachments

  • MathMagic190527_2.png
    MathMagic190527_2.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 100
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top