Is 3D reality merely an illusion?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Simple man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Reality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of the Holographic Universe, which posits that our 3D reality is a projection from a 2D cosmological horizon, driven by quantum bits (qubits) of information. Participants explore the implications of quantum entanglement, wave function collapse, and the nature of reality itself, questioning how information can behave like matter. The conversation highlights the challenges of understanding complex theories such as Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) and the expansion of the universe, emphasizing the need for a graduate-level background in relativity and quantum field theory to engage meaningfully with these ideas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics, specifically concepts of qubits and wave function collapse
  • Relativity theory, particularly Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT)
  • Cosmology, including the expansion of the universe and particle horizons
  • Understanding of dimensionality in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of the Holographic Universe and its implications for reality
  • Study Anti-de Sitter/Conformal Field Theory (AdS/CFT) and its applications in modern physics
  • Explore quantum entanglement and its role in the nature of information
  • Investigate the expansion of the universe and its relationship to dimensionality
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, cosmologists, and advanced students in theoretical physics who are exploring the intersections of quantum mechanics, relativity, and the nature of reality.

Simple man
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
As in the Holographic Universe, how does apparent 3D reality emerge from a 2D surface?
Hi, everyone!
I read an online article, some time ago, on the Holographic Universe, and how it might operate. According to the author, quantum bits, or"qubits"of information exist on the surface of a cosmological horizon. Complex interactions between these qubits result in them becoming entangled, disentangled, having wave function and superposition of states, to collapse of wave function and only one state. All of this quantum activity gives rise to perpetual indeterminacy and uncertainty among those bits. This activity then represents itself as a holographic projection of 3 dimensional reality, extruded from the 2D cosmological horizon.
My question is, how can information interact with itself, and behave like particles of matter? And if 3D reality bleeds from pre-encoded quantum bits of information, what did the initial encoding? And why does this pseudo reality seem so real?
Any feedback?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I think you are probably referring to the ADs/CFT type theories. This is only an idea, and it is usually formulated in more dimensions than 2 or 3. One of the more popular ones is a 5D bulk projecting onto a 4D surface.

Cheers
 
I've had similar thoughts,

We're told that most physicists believe in an infinite universe, this infinite universe is expanding however, as well as accelerating in its expansion.

I just can't get that to make any sense in my mind. What kind of medium are our universe expanding in? its hard to make sense of these things but I cross my fingers that someone could elaborate on this thought-wave.

IF the boundary of a conformally-compactified anti-de sitter space is itself a conformally-compactified minkowski space with one fewer dimension. Could that be what separates our universe from what ever else there is. outside reality is space without time? or at least with one fewer dimension of some sort.

I know I'm probably lost in faulty-thoughts here but if you think of a simulated universe the same way. What separates that universe from outside its boundary? What it is projected on, and in a sense "expanding in" are itself a conformally-compactified minkowski space with one fewer dimension, right? And outside its boundary time is not applicable? at least not what translates into time for that universe.

trying to understand this makes my brain loop, what does this mean? how do we even know there is anything past the particle horizon? How do we know that time is moving faster than light?
 
Simple man said:
I read an online article

This is not a valid reference. PF discussions, particularly of a highly speculative model like this, should be based on actual published literature--peer-reviewed papers.

Also, for this topic, it will be basically impossible to discuss it meaningfully at the "B" level; you will be hard pressed to find any peer-reviewed paper on the topic that can be understood without an "A" level (graduate level) background in relativity, quantum field theory, and cosmology.

Thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K