MHB Is 7 an irrational number in the set of integers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Set
nycfunction
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Determine if the number 7 is a natural number, an integer, a rational or irrational number.

I know that integers include positive and negative numbers and 0.

Let Z = the set of integers

Z = {. . . -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, . . .}

I also know that any integer Z can be written as Z/1 = Z.

I will conclude by saying the following:

7 = 7/1

So, 7 is a natural number, an integer and a rational number (because it can be written as a fraction over 1).

Does this apply to all integers, Z?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi nycfunction.

nycfunction said:
So, 7 is a natural number, an integer and a rational number (because it can be written as a fraction over 1).
That’s correct.

nycfunction said:
Does this apply to all integers, Z?
Let’s take an example, $-1$. It is an integer, but is it a natural number?
 
Olinguito said:
Hi nycfunction.

That’s correct.

Let’s take an example, $-1$. It is an integer, but is it a natural number?


The integer -1 is not a natural number aka whole number. This means not all integers Z are natural or whole numbers. Negative numbers are excluded.
 
You make your post unnecessarily confusing by using "Z" for the set of all integers and to mean an individual integer.
 
nycfunction said:
The integer -1 is not a natural number aka whole number. This means not all integers Z are natural or whole numbers. Negative numbers are excluded.
Many would agree but there is confusion about whether we should count 0 as a whole number. Some say yes, some say no. You can definitely say that all positive integers are whole numbers.

-Dan
 
Also, you do not address the last part of the problem. Is "7" an irrational number? What is the definition of "irrational number"? In fact, all of these are just a question of whether you know the definitions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top