Is a Group Homomorphic under Multiplication if it is Not Under Addition?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Turnyface
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of group homomorphisms, specifically whether a mapping can be homomorphic under multiplication if it is not under addition. Participants explore the properties of the integers under different operations and the implications of these properties for homomorphisms.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a mapping θ:Z -> Z defined by θ(n) = n^3, claiming it is a homomorphism under multiplication but not under addition.
  • Another participant questions the validity of discussing group homomorphisms since the integers do not form a group under multiplication.
  • There is a discussion about whether the operation must be preserved for all elements in order to qualify as a homomorphism, with some participants affirming this requirement.
  • One participant suggests that while the integers do not form a group under multiplication, they do form a semigroup, allowing for the discussion of semigroup morphisms.
  • Several participants emphasize that the original question pertains to addition, and thus the behavior under multiplication is not relevant to the inquiry.
  • There is a reiteration of the need to demonstrate that θ(n+m) does not equal θ(n) + θ(m) to establish that the mapping is not a homomorphism under addition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the applicability of group homomorphisms to the integers under multiplication. There is no consensus on the implications of the mapping θ(n) = n^3, particularly in relation to addition and multiplication.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integers do not form a group under multiplication, which complicates the discussion of homomorphisms. The conversation also highlights the necessity of preserving operations across all elements to qualify as a homomorphism.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and practitioners of abstract algebra, particularly those exploring the properties of homomorphisms and the structure of groups and semigroups.

Turnyface
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Consider θ:Z -> Z is a mapping where θ(n) = n^3 and it's homomorphism under multiplication. In this case, it's not a homomorphism under addition.

So my question is this. In general, if we show that a group is homomorphic under multiplication, does this imply that it is not under addition and vice versa?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the identity mapping?
Note, also, that the integers aren't a group under multiplication.
 
So if we take n=0 under addition, then it is a homomorphism, no? But for θ(n) = n^3 for elements not equal to 0, this is false. Does the operation have to be preserved for all n in order to be a homomorphism?

Edit: It has to be for all elements in Z. So it's not under addition, even considering the identity.

And to answer my own question:

Z->Z, θ(n)= n so θ(n+m) = θ(n)+θ(n)
Z->Z, θ(n)= n so θ(n*m) = θ(n)*θ(m)

Thus, the answer is no.
 
Last edited:
So if we take n=0 under addition, then it is a homomorphism, no?

I'm not sure what you mean by this.

Regarding the OP, again, the integers are not a group under multiplication, so it makes no sense to talk about group homomorphisms here.

Does the operation have to be preserved for all n in order to be a homomorphism?

Can you recite the definition of homomorphism?
 
Let H be a subgroup of G. Let * be an operation under G and # be an operation under H. Then for all a,b in G:

θ(a*b)=θ(a)#θ(b)

is a homomorphism.
 
As number 9 says, we don't have a group here, so we cannot talk about group morphisms. However, [itex]\mathbb{Z}[/itex] does form a semigroup under multiplication so we can talk about semigroup morphisms.

For that, we just need to check the same thing, namely that

[tex]\theta(n*m)=\theta(n)*\theta(m)[/tex]

is this satisfied?
 
Number Nine said:
I'm not sure what you mean by this.

Regarding the OP, again, the integers are not a group under multiplication, so it makes no sense to talk about group homomorphisms here.

So back to the original problem where θ(n) = n^3.

So if n=0 and the homomorphism theorem above.

θ(m+n) = θ(0+0) = (0+0)^3 = 0^3 + 0^3, since 0=0. This is not true for any other elements in Z.

For the same mapping, θ(n) = n^3, θ(mn) = (mn)^3 = (m)^3 * (n)^3. So this is a homomorphism under multiplication.
 
micromass said:
As number 9 says, we don't have a group here, so we cannot talk about group morphisms. However, [itex]\mathbb{Z}[/itex] does form a semigroup under multiplication so we can talk about semigroup morphisms.

For that, we just need to check the same thing, namely that

[tex]\theta(n*m)=\theta(n)*\theta(m)[/tex]

is this satisfied?

The original question is this:

"Let θ: Z->Z. Let θ(n) = n^3. Is this a homomorphism under addition?"

For the answer to the question, I showed that with θ: Z->Z and θ(n) = n^3, this is a homomorphism is under multiplication.

Is this not correct?
 
No, it is not correct. The question is asking about addition. So its behavior under multiplication is not relevant. You just need to show that for some value of n,m
theta(n+m) is not equal to theta(n)+theta(m).
 
  • #10
Vargo said:
No, it is not correct. The question is asking about addition. So its behavior under multiplication is not relevant. You just need to show that for some value of n,m
theta(n+m) is not equal to theta(n)+theta(m).

Figured. Hopefully partial credit is dished out.

I hate abstract algebra.

Thanks for the responses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K