Is a Non-Probabilistic Universe Conceivable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sixproph3tsix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of whether a non-probabilistic universe is conceivable, exploring the implications of probabilistic nature in the universe, particularly in relation to quantum mechanics and measurement. The scope includes theoretical considerations and philosophical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the universe is inherently probabilistic due to the probabilistic nature of its smallest constituents and questions the possibility of conceiving a non-probabilistic universe.
  • Another participant challenges the idea that the universe is "inherently probabilistic," suggesting that the concept may not be applicable to the universe at all.
  • A later reply elaborates on the probabilistic nature of the universe, proposing that while it seems probabilistic, there may be an underlying deterministic mechanism that remains unknown, likening it to a simulated universe with potential issues in random number generation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the inherent probabilistic nature of the universe, with no consensus reached on whether a non-probabilistic universe is conceivable.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining "probabilistic" and "deterministic" in the context of the universe, indicating that assumptions about measurement and observation may influence their perspectives.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics, the nature of reality, and discussions surrounding determinism and probability in the universe may find this thread relevant.

sixproph3tsix
Simple question...

The universe is inherently probabilistic because its smallest constituents are inherently probabilistic. Granted.

Is it even possible to conceive of a universe that is not probabilistic? To me, Quantum Mechanics aside, the probabilistic nature of a microscopic cosmos is a necessity based on the simple fact that we (measurement makers) are contained within it /part of it.

Do I need more elaboration? Does this thought make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not at all clear if the universe is "inherently probabilistic", or if that concept is even applicable to the universe.

Cheers,

Jazz
 
sixproph3tsix said:
Simple question...

The universe is inherently probabilistic because its smallest constituents are inherently probabilistic. Granted.

Is it even possible to conceive of a universe that is not probabilistic? To me, Quantum Mechanics aside, the probabilistic nature of a microscopic cosmos is a necessity based on the simple fact that we (measurement makers) are contained within it /part of it.

Do I need more elaboration? Does this thought make sense?

Look at it this way.

If you roll a dice a million times. Then you get someone else to do the same but instead of their results, you use some trickery to give them yours. Would they notice? Of course not. Is it random? Nope. It's exactly the same results that you got. Their results are completely deterministic. You're just reading them from a list.

Also, there are many ways you could rearrange and modify that list and they still wouldn't know.

So back to your question - is the universe probabilistic? Probably, but can never know for certain. Nature could be using some kind of psuedo random number generation. There may be an underlying mechanism to the numbers that we get for our probabilistic values.

Does it matter? Well there is a pretty strong argument that the universe that we live in, is actually simulated. If it were the case, perhaps the creators of our universe would have just the same problems with their random number generators as we do ours.

This idea might sound very fantastical but it's not easy to invalidate it. If you're interested, I can run you through the argument if you like.
 
Last edited:
The future of this thread is being discussed.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Is quantum mechanics imply nature is deterministic or probabilistic?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Graduate Universal quantum physics
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
High School Why so many want, or are not disturbed by, a "deterministic" universe?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
Graduate Can ChatGPT Handle Complex Physics Questions Accurately?
  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
17K
Undergrad Can TSQM Harmonize Free Will, Cause and Effect, and Retrocausality?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Graduate Can the 'shape' of the universe be described at the Plank scale?
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Graduate Probability via Expectation and Callen's criterion
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Graduate Is quantum theory a microscopic theory?
  • · Replies 232 ·
8
Replies
232
Views
22K
Graduate Is the unobservable universe free from quantum indeterminism?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Graduate Questioning assumptions behind Bell's and related theorems
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
11K