Is Alice's Arithmetic Wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euphoriet
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical expression 0/0, exploring its classification as either undefined or indeterminate. Participants engage in a debate regarding the implications of these terms, their definitions, and the contexts in which they apply, with references to mathematical functions and limits.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that 0/0 is indeterminate, emphasizing that it does not have a specific value.
  • Others argue that 0/0 is undefined, noting that it is not in the domain of the division function.
  • A few participants differentiate between "undefined" and "indeterminate," suggesting that the latter refers to a subclass of undefined values.
  • One participant humorously claims that 0/0 equals 42, indicating a playful approach to the discussion.
  • Several comments reflect on the confusion and lack of a constant answer regarding the expression, with some participants acknowledging the complexity of the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether 0/0 should be classified as undefined or indeterminate, with multiple competing views remaining throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the definitions and implications of the terms "undefined" and "indeterminate," and the discussion includes references to mathematical contexts that may not be fully resolved.

  • #61
would anyone care to explain what indeterminate and undefined mean exactly and why the obviously very significant difference is?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #62
I believe [but am not absolutely certain] that this an accurate representation of the difference.

00 = 1

The value is indeterminate, but defined to be 1 for consistency. By this, division by zero is both indeterminate and undefined.
 
  • #63
how does the 0 to the power of 0 will be 1. wouldn't it be 0?

i am a maths and science noob tho.
 
  • #64
kaos said:
how does the 0 to the power of 0 will be 1. wouldn't it be 0?

i am a maths and science noob tho.

Take a look at the function f(x)=x0. This motivates defining 00=1 in circumstances similar to this function. Take a look at the function g(x) = 0x. In circumstances similar to this function, we may want to define 00 to be 0. This is why 00 is indeterminate.
 
  • #65
BobG said:
Barely anyone even knows this is a Lewis Carroll reference, let alone what the question is (Douglas Addams gives a hint in his book, not the answer).
I hadn't a clue about Lewis Carroll. I only know from the books that although 42 was the correct answer, they had asked the wrong question. Please elucidate. (even on PM if you don't want to alter reality in the thread)

BobG said:
And if we're voting on it, I say we make division by zero immoral.
No! Then I'd spend the rest of my life doing it! I have other plans!
 
  • #66
Danger said:
I hadn't a clue about Lewis Carroll. I only know from the books that although 42 was the correct answer, they had asked the wrong question. Please elucidate.
There's a part where Alice starts doing weird arithmetic saying the '4 times tables' but seemingly getting it it all wrong. She also says something like "at this rate, I'll never reach 20".

The reason the multiplication that Alice is doing is not wrong is because she is not working in base 10. Each line of her tables is in a different base (chosen from some nice sequence with differences of 3). Following the sequence, you get 4*10=17 (base 33), 4*11=18 (base 36), 4*12 = 19 (base 39) and so, you'd expect 4*13=20 (base 42). But alas ! The correct answer, base 42, will be 1A. So her tables will never see a 20 in the answer !
 
  • #67
Gokul43201 said:
There's a part where Alice starts doing weird arithmetic saying the '4 times tables' but seemingly getting it it all wrong. She also says something like "at this rate, I'll never reach 20".

The reason the multiplication that Alice is doing is not wrong is because she is not working in base 10. Each line of her tables is in a different base (chosen from some nice sequence with differences of 3). Following the sequence, you get 4*10=17 (base 33), 4*11=18 (base 36), 4*12 = 19 (base 39) and so, you'd expect 4*13=20 (base 42). But alas ! The correct answer, base 42, will be 1A. So her tables will never see a 20 in the answer !

Tsu gives her age in hex [base 16].
I just noticed that the IRS forms never specify the base to be used. Hmmm. :rolleyes:
 
  • #68
Danger said:
I hadn't a clue about Lewis Carroll. I only know from the books that although 42 was the correct answer, they had asked the wrong question. Please elucidate. (even on PM if you don't want to alter reality in the thread)
Lewis Carroll used the number 42 constantly in his books because he was addicted to Physics Forum and 42 is the answer to all of PF's important questions.
 
  • #69
liz said:
would anyone care to explain what indeterminate and undefined mean exactly and why the obviously very significant difference is?

Undefined means that no meaning has been assigned, so in this case, as (0,0) is outside of the domain of the binary operator '/', '0/0' has no meaning assigned to it.

Something is indetermiante when it has no definte value assigned to it, for example say we take two functions and combine them into another function h(x) = f(x)/g(x). Let us say that the limits of f(x) and g(x) as x tends to some value c are both zero, then the limit of h(x) could take on any real value or not exist, so we call the limit of our general function h(x) as x tends to c 'indetereminate' (though rember it is a genarl function for a specific function the limit either exists and has a specific value or doesn't exist).
 
  • #70
Gokul43201 said:
There's a part where Alice starts doing weird arithmetic saying the '4 times tables' but seemingly getting it it all wrong. She also says something like "at this rate, I'll never reach 20".

The reason the multiplication that Alice is doing is not wrong is because she is not working in base 10. Each line of her tables is in a different base (chosen from some nice sequence with differences of 3). Following the sequence, you get 4*10=17 (base 33), 4*11=18 (base 36), 4*12 = 19 (base 39) and so, you'd expect 4*13=20 (base 42). But alas ! The correct answer, base 42, will be 1A. So her tables will never see a 20 in the answer !
I never knew that! Thanks Gokul. :approve:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K