student34
- 639
- 21
In other words, in terms of science, is there a category that has both antimatter and matter in it?
The discussion revolves around the classification of antimatter in relation to matter, exploring whether antimatter can be considered a type of matter and the implications of various definitions of matter in particle physics.
Participants express differing views on the definitions and classifications of matter and antimatter, indicating that there is no consensus on how to categorize antimatter within the framework of particle physics.
The discussion highlights the limitations of current definitions of matter, the dependence on specific criteria for classification, and the unresolved nature of how certain particles fit into these categories.
Or more specifically: "massive particles", to exclude photons, which are neither matter nor antimatter.mfb said:"Particles"
What about Z bosons? They are massive particles, but do not belong to "matter" or "antimatter" as they are their own antiparticles.A.T. said:Or more specifically: "massive particles", to exclude photons, which are neither matter nor antimatter.
student34 said:If we are using the definition of matter to be something of mass and volume, then isn't antimatter actually matter by this definition?