Is baryonium fermion or meson?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BuckeyePhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermion Meson
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Baryonium is a complex particle that does not fit neatly into the categories of baryons or mesons. While baryonium may exhibit bosonic properties due to its total spin being 0 or 1, it is essential to note that baryons are composed of three quarks, whereas mesons consist of a quark-antiquark pair. The discussion highlights that deuterons, which are bound states of two baryons, do not qualify as either baryons or mesons, emphasizing the importance of baryon number in classification. Ultimately, the classification of baryonium remains ambiguous, as it does not conform strictly to the definitions of baryons or mesons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics terminology, including baryons and mesons
  • Knowledge of quark composition and baryon number
  • Familiarity with the concept of spin in quantum mechanics
  • Basic principles of particle classification in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of baryons and mesons in quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Explore the implications of baryon number in particle classification
  • Study the role of spin in determining particle behavior and classification
  • Investigate the concept of bound states in particle physics, focusing on examples like deuterium and baryonium
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the classification and properties of subatomic particles will benefit from this discussion.

BuckeyePhysicist
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Is a baryonium baryon or meson?

For example, deutorium, a n-p bound-state, has total spin 0 pr 1, so it is boson, then, it is meson? But it has baryon number (3+3)/3=2.

For another example, bound-state of \Lambda_c - \bar{\Lambda_c}, has total spin 0 or 1, so again it is boson, it is meson? But it has baryon number (3-3)/3=0.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermions are particles with half integer spins. Bosons are particles with integer spins.

Mesons are particles that are composed of a quark-antiquark bound state.
Baryons are composed of 3 quarks (anti-baryons are composed of 3 anti-quarks).

So... just because a particle is a boson does not automatically make it a baryon.

This is similar to an argument about geometric shapes. All squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares, there is an additional constraint on a square- all its sides must be the same length.

I hope this helps.
 
It is relevant. But it does not answer the question.
Thank you any way.
 
Deuterons are neither baryons nor mesons. They are made up of two baryons, each of which is made up of three quarks. As Norman mentioned mesons are made up of quark-antiquark pairs.
 
BuckeyePhysicist said:
Is a baryonium baryon or meson?

For example, deutorium, a n-p bound-state, has total spin 0 pr 1, so it is boson, then, it is meson? But it has baryon number (3+3)/3=2.

For another example, bound-state of \Lambda_c - \bar{\Lambda_c}, has total spin 0 or 1, so again it is boson, it is meson? But it has baryon number (3-3)/3=0.
d is not a meson.
Mesons have baron number zero.
L-Lbar is a boson and a meson.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
991
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K