Is Cold Fusion for real this time?

  • Thread starter SF
  • Start date
  • #1
SF
http://physicsworld.com/blog/2008/05/coldfusion_demonstration_a_suc_1.html [Broken]

hey, it's physicsworld.com ...so what's up, anyone got some info?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,260
301
Note that this does not qualify as a scientific reference, but it is a claim of unexplained phenomena. It will be most interesting to see if the experiment can be duplicated.

A recent review of the evidence for cold fusion yielded a majority opinion that there were some anomalies worth investigating, but most likely not anything related to cold fusion.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=425462#post425462
 
  • #3
Mk
1,984
3
Japanese Cold Fusion Demonstration "successful"

http://physicsworld.com/blog/2008/05/coldfusion_demonstration_a_suc_1.html [Broken]
I will update you if and when I get any more information about the demonstration (apparently there might be some videos circulating soon). For now, though, you can form your own opinions about the reliability of cold fusion.
Interesting article, with real information. What do you think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #4
Borek
Mentor
28,600
3,078
I have been in one of those teams that "replicated" Fleischmann-Pons experiment. My boss was even interviewed by local TV. Since then I am pretty reluctant. Then, while I am not a nuclear scientis (closer to nucular, if anything), I have never heard why it CAN'T happen.
 
  • #5
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
18
I have been in one of those teams that "replicated" Fleischmann-Pons experiment. My boss was even interviewed by local TV. Since then I am pretty reluctant.
Did you actually measure a neutron flux?

Then, while I am not a nuclear scientis (closer to nucular, if anything), I have never heard why it CAN'T happen.
It is not that it can't happen. It is just that the calculated fusion rate is roughly 60 orders of magnitude lower than what was claimed by F&P.
 
  • #6
192
6
I think the debate of whether this is or isn't cold fusion is a bit of a red herring. I think the real question should be whether or not this could prove to be a viable option for energy production or whether these experiments are just novelties.

There have been claims of evidence transmutations occurring in these experiments. If this is the case the argument against this being a nuclear effect is null and void.
 
  • #7
Borek
Mentor
28,600
3,078
Did you actually measure a neutron flux?
No. That's why I put "replicated" in quotes. Could be I should put quotes around "experiment" as well. In fact we did nothing worth mentioning - apart from electrolysing heavy water on palladium electrode.

I was working in electrochemistry research lab and we happened to have palladium electrodes at hand, heavy water was brought from the other lab, everything else was just sitting on every bench. Most of the time it was just bubbling slowly. At some moments it was gettingt hot quite fast. No idea what happened. And I am not saying that we have seen cold fusion - I simply don't know what we have seen. Someone from the other lab suggested it was just catalytic oxidation of hydrogen (deuter to be precise). Before we decided to investigate further hype was over. Heavy water down the drain, electrodes to the box, case closed.



 
  • #8
450
132
I have to say that the comments in that article are fairly embarrassing for those who attack cold fusion. Someone explains that D-D fusion wouldn't produce neutrons, (which seems clear to me: 2+2 particles = 4 in the helium nucleus.) But then poster after poster ignores this and keeps demanding neutrons, with no counter explanation as to why they wouldn't all be in the helium!
 
  • #9
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,051
18
I have to say that the comments in that article are fairly embarrassing for those who attack cold fusion. Someone explains that D-D fusion wouldn't produce neutrons, (which seems clear to me: 2+2 particles = 4 in the helium nucleus.)
Not true. Most deuterium-deuterium fusion events produce either tritium and a proton or He-3 and a neutron. Additionally, deuterium and tritium react to make He-4 and a neutron, while deuterium and He-3 make He-4 and a proton.
 
  • #10
450
132
Not true. Most deuterium-deuterium fusion events produce either tritium and a proton or He-3 and a neutron. Additionally, deuterium and tritium react to make He-4 and a neutron, while deuterium and He-3 make He-4 and a proton.
Ah, they might have mentioned that. Is there a theoretical reason why a given reaction method couldn't largely favor He-4 over the others? I understand that no one wants free neutrons following them home after work - their absence is very ... convenient.
 
  • #11
Borek
Mentor
28,600
3,078
As I was just told, He-4 from D fusion is excited and it has to deexcite - in most cases it does so by quickly emiting p+ or n, sometimes by emitting γ (much slower). So that's just the way it is.
 
  • #12
Cold fusion reminds me on why fusion has not been observed within Bose-Eienstein condensate of Rb atoms. The bosons are confined in something like a spherical harmonic oscillator and could almost all of them occupy the groundstate at low temperature. But p+,p+ interaction has to be taken into account as well (Colomb blocking).

I belive that you could force nucleus towards eachother by maby some special crystal vibration mode. But the momentum is probably to low to overcome the threshold for a fusion reaction.

In principle its just to calulate some Hartree equation where you treat the nucleus as waves as well. I did onces for a carbon crystal and I found that the nucleus wave was extended around 5% of the crystall lattice distance. The wave function overlap of two nucleus in a confining electron gas, within a nuclear distace volume is probably small as well, if this is a masure of the probablity of having them "at the same place" -> causing nuclear reaction?...
 
  • #13
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
741
Creating 'free' mass might be objectionable to some physicists.
 

Related Threads on Is Cold Fusion for real this time?

  • Last Post
2
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
85
Views
42K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
10K
Top