Is complex momentum density possible?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of momentum density from a free Dirac wavefunction under boost conditions. It confirms that complex momentum density can occur, particularly when derived from the energy-momentum tensor of the Dirac Lagrangian. The participants clarify that while the momentum density may be complex, the integral over all space must yield a real value. Additionally, they address the challenge of defining momentum density for non-normalizable wavefunctions, concluding that it can be represented as the momentum density divided by the fermion density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation and its solutions
  • Familiarity with energy-momentum tensors in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of complex functions and their properties
  • Basic principles of Fourier analysis in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the energy-momentum tensor in quantum field theory
  • Study the implications of complex wavefunctions in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about normalization techniques for wavefunctions, particularly in quantum field theory
  • Explore the derivation and application of the Dirac Lagrangian in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers working with quantum field theory, particularly those focused on the Dirac equation and momentum density calculations.

blue2script
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Just a short question: I am currently calculating the momentum density of a free dirac wavefunction under boost. However, I get some complex density - can this happen or will it be a mistake on my side?

Thanks for your comments!
Blue2script

PS: In some forum there was a note that momentum density is derived from the real Lagrangian. What does that mean? I just took the momentum density given from the energy-momentum tensor of the normal Dirac Lagrangian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not completely sure what the context is, but I think you want to get some distributionfunction of the momenta p, i.e. \Psi(p). The function itself can be complex, since when you calculate what the chance is of some outcome you always use the absolute squared function, |\Psi(p)|^2. The argument p is, ofcoure, real-valued.

So yes, it is possible.
 
Thank you xepma for your answer! I guess I was just dump. I wanted to calculate the momentum density of a wavefunction that solves the dirac equation (in my context meaning \Psi\left(x\right)). From the free Dirac equation you can calculate the energy-momentum density T^{\mu\nu}. Integrating T^{00} over the whole space gives you the energy E of the wavefunction, integrating the 0i components gives you the momentum, and so on. However, sure the momentum density can be complex, but the integral over all the space has to be real again. That's just what happens to me if I get my i's right. So I was just blind and dump.

Anyway, thanks again!
With very best regards,
Blue2script
 
Hmmm... now I ran into another problem: how would you define the momentum density of a non-normalizable wavefunction? Consider for example the plane wave solutions of the free Dirac equation, \psi\left(x\right) = u\left(p\right) e^{ipx} (in one dimension). They have momentum p and energy E = \sqrt{p^2 + m^2}. However, these modes are not normalizable since the density of these modes is just constant in space. How can one then define a suitable momentum density whose integral over the space yields p?

I would be very happy about an answer! Thanks!
Blue2script
 
Ok, forget it again, think I got it. It is just the momentum density divided by the fermion density. Anyway, thanks for reading!
 
Hi. You can show that the energy tensor should always be real. You just have to remember that \overline{u(p)}u(p)=a real number, and that \gamma_{\mu}p^{\mu}u(p)=\pm mu(p). When you linearly expand the field in fourier-series, bilinears where p and p' different are sumed in conjugates, and where p and p' are the same are just real numbers.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K