Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the concept of complex momentum density in the context of free Dirac wavefunctions and their behavior under boosts. Participants explore the implications of complex values in momentum density calculations, particularly in relation to the energy-momentum tensor derived from the Dirac Lagrangian. The conversation also touches on the challenges posed by non-normalizable wavefunctions, such as plane wave solutions.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Blue2script questions whether obtaining a complex momentum density from a free Dirac wavefunction under boost indicates a mistake or is permissible.
- xepma suggests that the momentum distribution function can be complex, as the probability is derived from the absolute squared function, |\Psi(p)|^2, which is real-valued.
- Blue2script acknowledges the complexity of momentum density but emphasizes that the integral over all space should yield a real value.
- Blue2script raises a concern about defining momentum density for non-normalizable wavefunctions, specifically plane wave solutions, and seeks clarification on how to obtain a suitable definition that yields a real momentum value.
- Blue2script later proposes that the momentum density could be defined as the momentum density divided by the fermion density.
- Another participant notes that the energy tensor should always be real and provides reasoning based on properties of bilinears and Fourier expansions.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the implications of complex momentum density, with some suggesting it is acceptable while others raise concerns about its physical interpretation. The discussion regarding non-normalizable wavefunctions remains unresolved, with no consensus on how to define momentum density in that context.
Contextual Notes
Participants mention the dependence of momentum density on the properties of the wavefunction and the energy-momentum tensor, indicating that assumptions about normalizability and the nature of the wavefunction play a critical role in the discussion.