Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Is complimentarity an expression of HUP?

  1. Oct 10, 2013 #1
    Novice questions:

    1. All complimentarities seems to be an expression of HUP....

    (for example from some of the quantum eraser experiments such as DCQE)

    Is that correct? I.e. Complimentarity is NOT a phenomena/mystery that is seperate/different from HUP

    2. Can we derive/conclude complimentarities from each other?

    For example if we know position & momentum are complimentary;

    are we able to derive/conclude that time & energy must be complimentary?
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2013
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 10, 2013 #2

    UltrafastPED

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    When writing the Lagrangian in classical mechanics "momentum p conjugate to position q" is:

    p=∂L/∂v, where v=dq/dt

    If P,Q are the quantum operators that correspond to the original conjugate pair p,q then the quantum commutator satisfies the HUP:

    [P,Q] = -ih_bar

    Energy and time are _not_ a conjugate pair, and there is no "time operator" in QM.


    Complementarity is a principle of the Copenhagen interpretation of QM:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementarity_(physics [Broken])
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Is complimentarity an expression of HUP?
  1. Confusing HUP (Replies: 2)

  2. HUP: Particles <=> ? (Replies: 2)

  3. Distance and the HUP (Replies: 0)

Loading...