Is Consciousness Linked to Quantum Superposition and Entanglement?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of linking consciousness to quantum mechanics, specifically superposition and entanglement. A participant critiques an informal explanation that suggests conscious beings experience choices through superposition while claiming entanglement represents an illusion. The consensus is that these ideas lack scientific grounding and are dismissed as nonsensical. The conversation emphasizes the importance of rigorous scientific understanding when discussing complex topics like quantum physics and consciousness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts such as superposition and entanglement.
  • Familiarity with the principles of decoherence in quantum physics.
  • Basic knowledge of consciousness theories in neuroscience and philosophy.
  • Ability to differentiate between scientific discourse and pseudoscience.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of quantum mechanics, focusing on superposition and entanglement.
  • Explore the concept of decoherence and its implications for quantum states.
  • Study theories of consciousness from both scientific and philosophical perspectives.
  • Examine the criteria for distinguishing between valid scientific theories and pseudoscientific claims.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, philosophers of mind, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and consciousness will benefit from this discussion.

Bunduru
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Someone I know sent me something for validation. Is this train of thought headed in the right direction? Please forgive him for the informal language used; he doesn't have a physics background...Thanks!

"Superposition simply implies that conscious beings always have choices, and that entanglement (multiple states) is/are an illusion. For alive and conscious beings, complete decoherence never occurs, although regarding defined events (observable reality), everything that has ever been observed or can be observed has already decohered. The moment is seemingly faster than the speed of light, because it is already here."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is not even close to meaningful. In fact, it's the usual gibberish you'd expect from the average quack.

Sorry for being honest.

Jazz
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, HomogenousCow, dayalanand roy and 6 others
Jazzdude said:
This is not even close to meaningful. In fact, it's the usual gibberish you'd expect from the average quack.

Sorry for being honest.

Jazz
Alright, thanks for being honest!
 
Closed, as JazzDude has already said it all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

Undergrad Prof Mike Wiest's proposed link between quantum and consciousness
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
High School Question about quantum superposition
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Multi-scale Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Why don't we bury Schrodinger's Cat?
  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
11K
High School Quantum Entanglement information transmission idea to knock down....
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
Graduate Quantum Entangled Living Bacteria
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Graduate Is delayed choice remote entanglement of photons derived from TDSE?
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Undergrad Reconciling Determinism and Superposition in Quantum Theory
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Undergrad "Observer Effect" referring to two different things?
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
High School Quantum Entanglement: Explaining the Logic Behind It
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K