Is Deja Vu Caused by Personal Theories? A Closer Look

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sokal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the phenomenon of Deja Vu and whether it can be explained through personal theories. Participants explore the scientific validity of these theories, the challenges in defining Deja Vu, and the implications of personal interpretations in a scientific context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification, Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a personal theory about Deja Vu, inviting feedback on its validity.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism, suggesting that the theory violates principles of causality.
  • A different participant questions the applicability of the theory in controlled experiments and everyday observations.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of square root symbols in the proposed theory, indicating confusion or lack of clarity.
  • One participant argues that defining Deja Vu is challenging, and suggests that it may be linked to memory issues rather than a scientific phenomenon.
  • Another participant dismisses the theory as lacking physical interpretation, implying it does not align with established physics.
  • A reminder is issued that personal theories are not permitted on the forum, referencing community guidelines.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of personal theories regarding Deja Vu, with some challenging the scientific basis of the initial proposal. There is no consensus on the topic, and multiple competing perspectives remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the difficulty in scientifically defining Deja Vu and the potential influence of memory on the experience. There are unresolved questions regarding the mathematical aspects of the proposed theory.

Sokal
Hi,

I came up with a theory regarding Deja Vu last summer. Would be interested to hear what your opinions are about it. Please disregard the square root symbols, for some reason they seemed important when I wrote it, so I included them.

S
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0030.jpg
    IMG_0030.jpg
    25.3 KB · Views: 609
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty certain that you violate causality somewhere there. Nul points.
 
This would have been seen in other (more controlled) experiments and everyday life.
 
? why do we have to square root everything in the equation itself?
 
first of all, it is difficult to define a deja vu, let alone work it out scientifically. Besides, it could be attributed to bad memory.

Unfortunately, whatever you're saying doesn't have any physical interpretation, so it ain't physics.

You may have a bright future in quantum woo though. Like Nobel laureate Brian Josephson.
 
Personal theories are not allowed on PF. Please see the rules page. You can find the rules by clicking the "Rules" button at the top of the page.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
22K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
488
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K