MHB Is Each Extension of Degree 2 Normal?

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I want to show that each extension of degree $2$ is normal. I have done the following:

Let $K/F$ the field extension with $[F:K]=2$.

Let $a\in K\setminus F$. Then we have that $F\leq F(a)\leq K$.

We have that $[K:F]=2\Rightarrow [K:F(a)][F(a):F]=2$.

There are the following possibilities:
  • $[K:F(a)]=1$ and $[F(a):F]=2$
    In this case we have that $K=F(a)$ and $\deg m(a,F)=2$.
    In $K$, since $a\in K$, we have that $m(a,F)=(x-a)g(x)$, with $\deg g(x)=1$. Since $g$ is a linear polynomial of $K[x]$ , so it is of the form $x-c$, so its root $c$ must belong to $K$.
    That means that $m(a,K)$ splits in $K$, i.e., all the roots are in $K$. So, the extension $K/F$ is normal.
  • $[K:F(a)]=2$ and $[F(a):F]=1$
    In this case we have that $F=F(a)$, and so $a\in F$, a contradiction.
Is this correct? Could I improve something? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
  • $[K:F(a)]=1$ and $[F(a):F]=2$
    In this case we have that $K=F(a)$ and $\deg m(a,F)=2$.
    In $K$, since $a\in K$, we have that $m(a,F)=(x-a)g(x)$, with $\deg g(x)=1$. Since $g$ is a linear polynomial of $K[x]$ , so it is of the form $x-c$, so its root $c$ must belong to $K$.
    That means that $m(a,K)$ splits in $K$, i.e., all the roots are in $K$. So, the extension $K/F$ is normal.

We have that $m(a,K)$ splits in $K$, i.e., all the roots are in $K$. Does this mean then that all the irreducible polynomials that have one root in $K$, have all the roots in $K$ ? Or how do we conclude then that the extension $K/F$ is normal ? (Wondering)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
981
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K