Is f(x) of exponential order for the Laplace Transform?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the conditions under which a function \( f(x) \) is considered to be of exponential order in the context of the Laplace transform. Participants explore the implications of transforming the function \( f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \) and whether it retains the properties necessary for the Laplace transform to exist.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the definition of the forward Laplace transform and questions whether the same applies to \( f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \).
  • Another participant asserts that the transformation of \( f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \) does not hold as initially stated, emphasizing the assumption that \( g(x) = f(1/x) \) must be of exponential order.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the term "exponential order," prompting a definition that describes it as a condition where a function grows no faster than an exponential function.
  • The definition provided states that a function \( f \) is of exponential order if there exists a constant \( a > 0 \) such that \( \lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} |f(t)e^{-at}| = 0 \), which is necessary for the existence of the Laplace transform.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the application of the Laplace transform to \( f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \). There is no consensus on whether the transformation can be applied as initially proposed, and the concept of exponential order is clarified but not universally agreed upon in its implications.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the implications of transforming \( f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) \) or the conditions under which a function is of exponential order, leaving these points open for further exploration.

EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello,

By definition, the forward Laplace transform of a function [tex]f(x)[/tex] is:

[tex]\mathcal{L}\left\{f(x)\right\}=\int_0^{\infty}\text{e}^{-sx}f(x)\,dx[/tex].

Can we say the same for the function [tex]f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)[/tex], i.e.:

[tex]\mathcal{L}\left\{f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right\}=\int_0^{\infty}\text{e}^{-\frac{s}{x}}f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\,dx[/tex].??

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, at least not as you have written it. If [itex]g(x) = f(1/x)[/itex] then

[tex]\mathcal{L}(g) = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}g(x)\, dx = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}f(1/x)\, dx[/tex]

assuming g(x) is of exponential order.
 
LCKurtz said:
No, at least not as you have written it. If [itex]g(x) = f(1/x)[/itex] then

[tex]\mathcal{L}(g) = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}g(x)\, dx = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}f(1/x)\, dx[/tex]

assuming g(x) is of exponential order.

Ok, I see. But what do you mean by "exponential order"?
 
S_David said:
Ok, I see. But what do you mean by "exponential order"?

A function f is of exponential order if, informally, it grows no faster than an exponential. The definition is there exists a > 0 such that:

[tex]\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} |f(t)e^{-at}| = 0[/tex]

This is the usual condition given to ensure the Laplace transform of f exists.
 
LCKurtz said:
A function f is of exponential order if, informally, it grows no faster than an exponential. The definition is there exists a > 0 such that:

[tex]\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} |f(t)e^{-at}| = 0[/tex]

This is the usual condition given to ensure the Laplace transform of f exists.

Ok, thanks.

Regards
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K