Is f(x) of exponential order for the Laplace Transform?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 4K views
EngWiPy
Messages
1,361
Reaction score
61
Hello,

By definition, the forward Laplace transform of a function [tex]f(x)[/tex] is:

[tex]\mathcal{L}\left\{f(x)\right\}=\int_0^{\infty}\text{e}^{-sx}f(x)\,dx[/tex].

Can we say the same for the function [tex]f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)[/tex], i.e.:

[tex]\mathcal{L}\left\{f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\right\}=\int_0^{\infty}\text{e}^{-\frac{s}{x}}f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\,dx[/tex].??

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, at least not as you have written it. If [itex]g(x) = f(1/x)[/itex] then

[tex]\mathcal{L}(g) = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}g(x)\, dx = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}f(1/x)\, dx[/tex]

assuming g(x) is of exponential order.
 
LCKurtz said:
No, at least not as you have written it. If [itex]g(x) = f(1/x)[/itex] then

[tex]\mathcal{L}(g) = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}g(x)\, dx = \int_0^\infty e^{-sx}f(1/x)\, dx[/tex]

assuming g(x) is of exponential order.

Ok, I see. But what do you mean by "exponential order"?
 
S_David said:
Ok, I see. But what do you mean by "exponential order"?

A function f is of exponential order if, informally, it grows no faster than an exponential. The definition is there exists a > 0 such that:

[tex]\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} |f(t)e^{-at}| = 0[/tex]

This is the usual condition given to ensure the Laplace transform of f exists.
 
LCKurtz said:
A function f is of exponential order if, informally, it grows no faster than an exponential. The definition is there exists a > 0 such that:

[tex]\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty} |f(t)e^{-at}| = 0[/tex]

This is the usual condition given to ensure the Laplace transform of f exists.

Ok, thanks.

Regards