Is 'Fuzzy' logic an appropiate Quantum logic ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tpm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic Quantum
tpm
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
is 'Fuzzy' logic an appropiate Quantum logic ??

reading...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzzy_logic the question is if we must stablish the fuzzy logic as a method to understand "Quantum World" and the fact that this may help to understand quantization better.

SO we have in nature not probabilities but only "degrees of truth" that are weighted according to some nature laws, in fact is there some method of Quantum logic :confused: that allow us to think differently with its proper system of axioms and rules.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an interesting idea. Have you heard of relational quantum mechanics? It basically proposes a similar idea (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/#Mermin").

But Isham and Butterfield proposed that Intuitionistic Logic could be used as a quantum logic in their paper "Some possible roles for Topos in Quantum Mechanics" (see arxiv.org/gr-qc/9910005). I warn you, it's complicated math.

That's an interesting idea though, to be honest.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


If anybody know something more about using fuzzy logic in physic? Sorry for my english.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top