1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Is infinity plus or minus one possible?

  1. Dec 30, 2010 #1
    Can you have infinity plus or minus one? Assuming infinity is possible of course.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 30, 2010 #2

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    In our ordinary number system(s), infinity is not a number. Thus, you cannot add it to anything.

    it is perfectly possible to create a number system in which infinity I is a number, that has its own special and unique properties, just like the other numbers have theirs.
    In such a system, for example, as a closure of the positive integers, I is a number that, given any number "a" has the property I+a=I for all "a".
     
  4. Dec 30, 2010 #3
    In a newly created number system would it be possible to say that the current number of monkeys in the world is I (infinite) and when a monkey gives bisth it is I + 1?
     
  5. Dec 30, 2010 #4

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    And since I+1=I, there are "I" monkeys there. :smile:
     
  6. Dec 30, 2010 #5
    So "I" is defined by the current number of monkeys? Doesn’t this "anything is possible" approaoch remove any particle meaning and use of the term infinite?

    In other words hasn’t the very meaning of infinite been changed and not just the numbers system?

    ETA - Isn’t infinity merely a theoretical lack of a beginning and end?
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2010
  7. Dec 30, 2010 #6

    AlephZero

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    When you started learning arithmetic, you probably got the idea that "numbers" have something to do with the "real world" (whatever that is), and that "two apples" have something to do with the number "two".

    If you want to progress with math, sooner or later you have to realize that those real-world ideas are irrelevant. Concepts like "number" or "infinity" mean whatever mathematicians define them to mean. If the definitions don't seem to match up with "common sense", then the math definition wins and common sense loses.

    If you want to explore some simple mathematical ideas about infinity, Google for the "Hilbert's Hotel" paradoxes. It's an imaginary hotel with an infinite number of rooms - the so-called paradoxes are about what can happen when every room is already occupied but more people (even infinitely more people) want to check in. (The hotel is imaginary, but Hilbert was a real mathematician, working about 100 years ago).
     
  8. Dec 30, 2010 #7

    gb7nash

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    For the extended real numbers, yes. There is + and - infinity. In the extended complex plane however, there's just infinity. It depends on the context.
     
  9. Dec 31, 2010 #8
    Thanks for all the posts. Merry 2010/2011 and beyond.
     
  10. Dec 31, 2010 #9
    Infinity is usually first [formally] encountered when learning of infinite limits, so it would also be appropriate to think of ∞±1 as the limit n±1 as n becomes infinite. As n becomes infinite, the ±1 would become negligible, thus the limit of n±1, as n becomes infinite, is ∞. This can be generalized to say that ∞±c, where c is any constant, is always just ∞.
     
  11. Jan 2, 2011 #10
    infity means INFINITY, dude! Just plusing or minusing some lil value rather than another infinity doesnt really bother to hamper its value at all...
    For example when you fill a bottle with sea water, the water level does not really change that negligible, right? And infinity is much more huge than any ocean :p thats why we dont count them: infinity +/- 1 = infinity
     
  12. Jan 2, 2011 #11
    I think a consistent number system is possible, and really more natural, where I+1≠I. That is, I+1 is irreducible much in the same way that vector elements, as an ordered set, are not reducible to a single element.

    For example,

    [tex]ax + b\frac{1}{dx}\ ,[/tex]

    or generalized to "higher orders" of infinity,

    [tex]ax + b\frac{1}{dx} + c\frac{1}{(dx)^2} + d\frac{1}{(dx)^3} + ... \ .[/tex]
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2011
  13. Jan 3, 2011 #12
    In cardinal numbers, [itex]\aleph_0 + 1 = \aleph_0[/itex], but subtraction is undefined.

    In ordinal numbers, [itex]1+\omega = \omega[/itex] but [itex]\omega+1 \ne \omega[/itex] .
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook