MHB Is It Linear in the Indicated Dependent Variable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter find_the_fun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I'm unclear how to do these kinds of questions. Here's an example

Determine whether the given first-order differential equation is linear in the indicated dependent variable by matching it with the equation $$a_1(x)\frac{dy}{dx} = + a_o(x)y=g(x)$$

[math](y^2-1)dx+xdy=0[/math]; in y; in x

The answer is it's linear in x but nonlinear in y.

First off I don't understand "indicated dependent variable", is it saying first consider y as a function of x and then consider x as a function of y? What difference does this have on the solution?

Here's what I tried.

[math](y^2-1)dx+xdy=0[/math]
[math](y^2-1)+x\frac{dy}{dx}=0[/math]
[math]x\frac{dy}{dx}+y^2=1[/math]
Therefore [math]a_1(x)=x[/math], [math]a_o(x)=invalid[/math] and [math]g(x)=1[/math] Since one is invalid the equation is non linear in y.

For it being linear in x
[math](y^2-1)dx+xdy=0[/math]
[math](y^2-1)\frac{dx}{dy}+x=0[/math]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: linear in x but not linear in y

find_the_fun said:
I'm unclear how to do these kinds of questions. Here's an example

Determine whether the given first-order differential equation is linear in the indicated dependent variable by matching it with the equation $$a_1(x)\frac{dy}{dx} = + a_o(x)y=g(x)$$

[math](y^2-1)dx+xdy=0[/math]; in y; in x

The answer is it's linear in x but nonlinear in y.

First off I don't understand "indicated dependent variable", is it saying first consider y as a function of x and then consider x as a function of y? What difference does this have on the solution?

Here's what I tried.

[math](y^2-1)dx+xdy=0[/math]
[math](y^2-1)+x\frac{dy}{dx}=0[/math]
[math]x\frac{dy}{dx}+y^2=1[/math]
Therefore [math]a_1(x)=x[/math], [math]a_o(x)=invalid[/math] and [math]g(x)=1[/math] Since one is invalid the equation is non linear in y.

For it being linear in x
[math](y^2-1)dx+xdy=0[/math]
[math](y^2-1)\frac{dx}{dy}+x=0[/math]

I tend to like to write linear equations in the form:

$$\tag{1}\frac{dy}{dx}+P(x)y=Q(x)$$

Okay, we are given the ODE:

$$\left(y^2-1 \right)\,dx+x\,dy=0$$

To check for linearity in $y$, we try to express the ODE in the form given by (1). I find the form, which is equivalent to what you found:

$$\frac{dy}{dx}+\frac{1}{x}y^2=\frac{1}{x}$$

The fact that $y$ is squared means the ODE is non-linear in $y$.

To check for linearity in $x$, we want to express the ODE in the form:

$$\tag{2}\frac{dx}{dy}+P(y)x=Q(y)$$

We find the form equivalent to what you found:

$$\frac{dx}{dy}+\frac{1}{y^2-1}x=0$$

So the equation is linear in $x$.

In practice linear equations are much easier to solve that non-linear equations, and so if we can write an ODE in linear form, then we will be able to more easily solve it. The difference in the solution is we will get $x(y)$ as the solution rather than $y(x)$.
 
I have the equation ##F^x=m\frac {d}{dt}(\gamma v^x)##, where ##\gamma## is the Lorentz factor, and ##x## is a superscript, not an exponent. In my textbook the solution is given as ##\frac {F^x}{m}t=\frac {v^x}{\sqrt {1-v^{x^2}/c^2}}##. What bothers me is, when I separate the variables I get ##\frac {F^x}{m}dt=d(\gamma v^x)##. Can I simply consider ##d(\gamma v^x)## the variable of integration without any further considerations? Can I simply make the substitution ##\gamma v^x = u## and then...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
434
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
845
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
257
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K