Is it necessary to expand the quantity before factoring the expression?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the factorization of the expression 4a²b² - 9(ab + c)² from Precalculus by David Cohen, 3rd Edition, Chapter 1, Section 1.3, Question 29c. Participants confirm that expanding the quantity (ab + c) is unnecessary for factorization, as the expression can be recognized as a difference of squares: (2ab)² - (3(ab + c))². The factorization proceeds with the substitution of x = 2ab and y = 3(ab + c), leading to the factors (2ab - 3(ab + c))(2ab + 3(ab + c)). While further simplification is not required, some participants suggest it is good practice to simplify when possible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial expressions and their factorization
  • Familiarity with the difference of squares formula
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the difference of squares in greater detail
  • Practice polynomial factorization techniques
  • Explore the implications of simplifying expressions after factorization
  • Review substitution methods in algebra for complex expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying precalculus, educators teaching algebraic concepts, and anyone looking to enhance their skills in polynomial factorization.

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Precalculus by David Cohen, 3rd Edition
Chapter 1, Section 1.3.
Question 29c.

Factor the expression.

4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2

Must I expand the quantity (ab + c) before factoring?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Precalculus by David Cohen, 3rd Edition
Chapter 1, Section 1.3.
Question 29c.

Factor the expression.

4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2

Must I expand the quantity (ab + c) before factoring?

You need not

you get as $(2ab)^2 - (3(ab+c))^2$ difference of 2 squares and now you should be able to proceed
 
(2ab)^2−(3(ab+c))^2

I will let 2ab = x and [3(ab + c)] = y.

x^2 - y^(2)

(x - y)(x + y)

Back-substitute now.

[(2ab - 3(ab + c)][(2ab + 3(ab + c)]

Correct?
 
RTCNTC said:
(2ab)^2−(3(ab+c))^2

I will let 2ab = x and [3(ab + c)] = y.

x^2 - y^(2)

(x - y)(x + y)

Back-substitute now.

[(2ab - 3(ab + c)][(2ab + 3(ab + c)]

Correct?

Yes, although I would distribute within the factors and then combine like terms. :D
 
I thought about distributing within the factors and combining like terms but the question is asking to factor not to simplify after factoring.
 
RTCNTC said:
I thought about distributing within the factors and combining like terms but the question is asking to factor not to simplify after factoring.

Well, technically, further simplification is not required to complete the goal of factorization...you have indeed factored...but in my opinion, it's just good practice to simplify whenever possible.
 
MarkFL said:
Well, technically, further simplification is not required to complete the goal of factorization...you have indeed factored...but in my opinion, it's just good practice to simplify whenever possible.

I agree.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K