MHB Is it necessary to expand the quantity before factoring the expression?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
Expanding the expression (ab + c) is not necessary to factor 4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2. The expression can be recognized as a difference of squares, allowing it to be factored directly as (2ab)^2 - (3(ab + c))^2. By substituting x for 2ab and y for 3(ab + c), it can be factored into (x - y)(x + y). While further simplification is not required, some participants suggest that simplifying the factors can be beneficial for clarity. Ultimately, the focus remains on achieving the factorization without mandatory expansion.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Precalculus by David Cohen, 3rd Edition
Chapter 1, Section 1.3.
Question 29c.

Factor the expression.

4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2

Must I expand the quantity (ab + c) before factoring?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Precalculus by David Cohen, 3rd Edition
Chapter 1, Section 1.3.
Question 29c.

Factor the expression.

4a^2b^2 - 9(ab + c)^2

Must I expand the quantity (ab + c) before factoring?

You need not

you get as $(2ab)^2 - (3(ab+c))^2$ difference of 2 squares and now you should be able to proceed
 
(2ab)^2−(3(ab+c))^2

I will let 2ab = x and [3(ab + c)] = y.

x^2 - y^(2)

(x - y)(x + y)

Back-substitute now.

[(2ab - 3(ab + c)][(2ab + 3(ab + c)]

Correct?
 
RTCNTC said:
(2ab)^2−(3(ab+c))^2

I will let 2ab = x and [3(ab + c)] = y.

x^2 - y^(2)

(x - y)(x + y)

Back-substitute now.

[(2ab - 3(ab + c)][(2ab + 3(ab + c)]

Correct?

Yes, although I would distribute within the factors and then combine like terms. :D
 
I thought about distributing within the factors and combining like terms but the question is asking to factor not to simplify after factoring.
 
RTCNTC said:
I thought about distributing within the factors and combining like terms but the question is asking to factor not to simplify after factoring.

Well, technically, further simplification is not required to complete the goal of factorization...you have indeed factored...but in my opinion, it's just good practice to simplify whenever possible.
 
MarkFL said:
Well, technically, further simplification is not required to complete the goal of factorization...you have indeed factored...but in my opinion, it's just good practice to simplify whenever possible.

I agree.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top