TheAquascaper
- 1
- 0
- TL;DR
- Is it possible for matter to be completely destroyed at the atomic level so that it no longer exists at all, and is it possible to keep cutting something in half forever?
I have 2 question about matter and atoms. I’m trying to learn here, excuse my ignorance :/
1. Is it possible for matter to be completely destroyed at the atomic level so that it no longer exists at all?
For instance, if you exposed ashes to extremely high temperatures, such as those found in the Sun, could they be permanently eradicated? Or does matter always continue to exist in some form, simply changing into something else and being recycled over time? Can stuff turns into “Nothingness”? (As in absense of stuff, not the non existence of time and space)
2. I was wondering whether it's really possible to keep cutting something in half forever. I know that, according to our current understanding of physics, there comes a point where you reach particles that can't be divided any further. However, I'm not sure I fully understand what that means. as far as I know particles aren't really there, they are just maths that describes our observations. And no one has seen a particle in the lab or a collider before, all are indirect observations that we then interpret as being a particle. So again, is it possible that it turned into “Nothingness”?
1. Is it possible for matter to be completely destroyed at the atomic level so that it no longer exists at all?
For instance, if you exposed ashes to extremely high temperatures, such as those found in the Sun, could they be permanently eradicated? Or does matter always continue to exist in some form, simply changing into something else and being recycled over time? Can stuff turns into “Nothingness”? (As in absense of stuff, not the non existence of time and space)
2. I was wondering whether it's really possible to keep cutting something in half forever. I know that, according to our current understanding of physics, there comes a point where you reach particles that can't be divided any further. However, I'm not sure I fully understand what that means. as far as I know particles aren't really there, they are just maths that describes our observations. And no one has seen a particle in the lab or a collider before, all are indirect observations that we then interpret as being a particle. So again, is it possible that it turned into “Nothingness”?