High School Is it possible to compress the space without gravity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sandip Kumar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Space
Click For Summary
Compressing space without gravity is not feasible, as space is not a tangible entity that can be compressed. When discussing the appearance of compressed space, it is actually distance that is being altered, not space itself. The concept of space-time is often confused with space, but they are distinct. The discussion concludes that the original question lacks clarity and has been sufficiently addressed. The thread is now closed.
Sandip Kumar
Is it possible to compress the space without gravity?
 
Space news on Phys.org
How could you compress a space without matter?
 
Could you expand (no pun intended) a little bit more on what you are trying to say?
EDIT:
:welcome:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
If you travel at extremely high speed, space compresses in front of you (from your point of view.)
 
Sandip Kumar said:
Is it possible to compress the space without gravity?
No, space is not a tangible thing that can be compressed. As is pointed out above, you can make it apprear that space is compressed but that's really just DISTANCE that is being compressed, not space.

I think you are being misled by statements about SPACE-TIME, which is not the same thing as space.
 
Sandip Kumar said:
Is it possible to compress the space without gravity?
This question doesn't make sense, as explained.
phinds said:
No, space is not a tangible thing that can be compressed. As is pointed out above, you can make it apprear that space is compressed but that's really just DISTANCE that is being compressed, not space.

I think you are being misled by statements about SPACE-TIME, which is not the same thing as space.
As the question has been answered and there is nothing left to say, I close this thread now.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K