Is it possible to define irrational powers for negative numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unredeemed
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of defining irrational powers for negative numbers, particularly in the context of the function y=x^(1/x). It is noted that while positive values of x yield straightforward results, negative integers produce complex values for even integers and real values for odd integers. The conversation explores the possibility of transforming negative numbers into integers to determine their properties based on parity. Additionally, the need for a specific definition for irrational powers, such as -pi^(-pi), is highlighted. The consensus indicates that the function is generally defined for positive bases, with complex number considerations for negative bases.
Unredeemed
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to plot the graph of y=x^(1/x).

The positive values of x have been fine, but the negative values have presented quite a challenge.

For even negative integers, I realized the y value was complex and for odd negative integers it was real.

Then, I started thinking about the vaues between integers (e.g. -2.5^(1/-2.5) and could only really come up with an answer for the rational negatives.

Am I right in thinking that you can find out by transforming the number into an integer by multiplying by a power of 10 and then seeing if it's odd or even?

I had absolutely no idea about how to deal with the irrational number (e.g. -pi^(-pi)). Does it require some kind of definition for irrational powers?

Thanks, in advance, for your help.

Unredeemed.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One approach is to use the following: xy=eyln(x).

If x < 0 (or in general, x complex), x=rexp(iu). So ln(x)= ln(r) +iu. For x < 0, u=π.

Therefore for x < 0, xy=ey{ln(|x|)+πi}.

I hope this helps!
 
Generally speaking, the function f(x)= a^x is only defined for positive a. That means that f(x)= x^x can only be defined for positive x.

(Or, as Mathman does, go into complex numbers.)
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K