Is it Possible to Measure Q or P Without Determining x1 and x2 or p1 and p2?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter clacker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure observables
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of observables in a two-particle system, specifically the separation (Q) and total momentum (P) of the particles. Participants explore the implications of measuring these observables, the relationship between position and momentum, and the constraints imposed by the uncertainty principle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is possible to measure the separation Q and total momentum P without directly measuring the individual particle positions (x1, x2) or momenta (p1, p2), suggesting that doing so may violate the uncertainty principle.
  • Another participant asserts that Q and P belong to different, independent subsystems or quasi-particles and are directly measurable, referencing specific chapters from a paper.
  • A participant expresses concern that measuring x1 and x2 separately does not place the system in an eigenstate of Q, but rather in separate eigenstates for each particle.
  • Another participant counters that measuring x1 and x2 introduces correlations between the variables, implying that the relative motion constitutes a subsystem with distinct properties.
  • One participant raises the issue of whether measuring Q and then P would lead to knowing all particle properties with certainty, thus potentially violating the uncertainty principle.
  • A later reply proposes a scenario where measuring Q could be achieved through a specific experimental setup involving position detectors, suggesting that this method could prepare an eigenstate of Q without disturbing the momentum measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of measuring Q and P without directly measuring the individual particle properties. There is no consensus on whether such measurements can be made without violating the uncertainty principle, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of measurements on the definitions of the observables and the implications of correlations between particle properties. The discussion also touches on the implications of the uncertainty principle in the context of simultaneous measurements.

clacker
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Question about measuring observables. If have 2 particle system the particle separation
Q=x1-x2 and total momentum P=p1+p2 are observables of the system as a whole and are
commuting. How do you measure these observables. It would seem the only way to
measure the separation is to measure the individual particle positions x1,x2 and subtract
them. With the total momentum you measure the particle momentum's separation and add.
However, since Q,P commute you should be able to measure Q,P simultaneously. But if do
it by measuring individual particle properties you have violated uncertainty principle since
you have both position and momentum for each particle. So is there some way to measure
Q or P without determining x1 and x2 or p1 and p2 or are Q and P nonmeasurable and only really mathematical fictions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your P and Q belong to different, independent subsystems or quasi-particles. They are directly measurable. See Chapters 1 and 3 in http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.4416.
 
My question is not the measuring of P and Q together, but how do you measure just Q say. If you measure each particles position separately then subtract I don't think you are actually in an eigenstate of Q but rather in 2 separate 1 particle eigenstates.
 
No, not even so because the variables x1 and x2 are correlated (not independent). The relative motion is a subsystem with its own properties - proper frequencies, angular momenta, energies, etc.
 
so you're saying that if I measure x1 and x2 that put's me into an eigenstate of Q.
What about the fact that Q and P commute. If I now measure P haven't I got
x1,x2,p1,p2 and now know each particles position and momentum with certainty thus
violating the uncertainty principle.
 
Hi.

clacker said:
My question is not the measuring of P and Q together, but how do you measure just Q say.

I considered it on such a case that x1 and x2 are not positions of the different particles but different directions say x and y of the same particle.

Let a particle be on the plane. Position detector of 100% sensitivity is placed on each point of the plane except on the line x - y = a. If no detector works when you make observation, you succeed to prepare eigenstate of Q of eigenvalue a.
It's the case of particle beam shoot on the screen with line slit. Momentum component along with the slit line, say px + py = P is not disturbed by the position measurement at the slit. So P and Q commute.

I hope it will make any sense.
Regards.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K