High School Is it possible to use technology from a nervous system?

Click For Summary
The discussion explores the feasibility of using nervous system technology, specifically the propagation of action potentials and artificial myelin sheaths, in modern applications. It highlights that while superconductors exhibit zero resistance, their high cost and energy requirements for low temperatures limit their practicality. Ceramic materials are mentioned as a brittle alternative, but they do not solve the resistance issue. The action potential mechanism is identified as suitable only for information transmission, necessitating a power source for operation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the intersection of physiology and technology in advancing communication methods.
lekh2003
Gold Member
Messages
539
Reaction score
342
Is it in anyway possible to use the "propagation of action potential" and an artificial myelin sheath in modern technology? Would this method overcome the problem of resistance?

I found that superconductors have zero resistance but are too expensive. So ceramic can be used, but that is brittle. Would the technology from our nervous system be any better?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is as much a physiology question as it is a technology question.
Here is a link that describes the process:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_potential#Process_in_a_typical_neuron
The main point is that the action potential depends on an existing membrane ionization that must be restored after the signal has passed.
So it is only appropriate for the transmission of information (not power), and it requires a power source.

In communication technology, using repeaters to reformat and retransmit messages is common.
 
  • Like
Likes lekh2003
lekh2003 said:
I found that superconductors have zero resistance but are too expensive.
They also require very low temps which takes a lot of energy to maintain. Much research is being done on cuprate superconductors or other "high temperature" superconductors...
 
.Scott said:
This is as much a physiology question as it is a technology question.
Here is a link that describes the process:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_potential#Process_in_a_typical_neuron
The main point is that the action potential depends on an existing membrane ionization that must be restored after the signal has passed.
So it is only appropriate for the transmission of information (not power), and it requires a power source.

In communication technology, using repeaters to reformat and retransmit messages is common.

Thanks, that was really helpful.
 
jerromyjon said:
They also require very low temps which takes a lot of energy to maintain. Much research is being done on cuprate superconductors or other "high temperature" superconductors...
Yet both high temperature and low temperature superconductors are equally as expensive right now.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
7K