Is kinematics/dynamics an everyday part of the job?

  • Thread starter Thread starter [Quadratic]
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Job
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relevance and enjoyment of introductory physics courses, specifically Physics I and II, for students considering a future in physics. Participants agree that while Physics I may seem tedious and overly mathematical, Physics II, particularly in topics like Electromagnetism (E&M), is often perceived as more engaging and profound. The consensus is that foundational physics knowledge is essential, but the specific applications vary by field. Students are encouraged to persist through initial challenges, as later courses can reveal the beauty and excitement of physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with introductory physics principles
  • Knowledge of Electromagnetism (E&M) fundamentals
  • Interest in quantum mechanics (QM) concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the curriculum of Physics II, focusing on Electromagnetism
  • Research quantum mechanics (QM) introductory courses and materials
  • Investigate the differences between physics and electrical engineering (EE) majors
  • Read pop-science literature to enhance understanding of complex physics topics
USEFUL FOR

Students considering a major in physics or electrical engineering, educators seeking to improve physics curriculum engagement, and anyone interested in the transition from basic physics to more advanced topics like Electromagnetism and quantum mechanics.

[Quadratic]
Messages
59
Reaction score
3
I'm a math major currently in calc 3, and I'm also taking my first ever physics class. I've always had a very strong interest in physics from pop-sci books and Feynman's lectures, and I fantasized about doing some work in physics, possibly even changing majors. The problem I find myself having is I find this physics class to be incredibly boring. It is an 8:00 am class and my teacher doesn't exactly get me excited for her lectures, and I just do not find this class to be enjoyable at all. I also don't think I'm very good at it, average at best.

So, getting to the point, is this stuff crucial to every physicist all of the time, regardless of their field? Does it get better/more interesting? Is the fact that I'm not enjoying this class a sign that I probably do not have a future in physics? Or is it one of those classes that you just have to get through in order to get to the good stuff?

Also I'm taking a pretty heavy course load and do not have the time to really dedicate to learning the material as deeply as I should, and as long as I survive the rest of this semester I'm going to take it a little easier on myself in the spring when I take physics II. Hopefully it won't be as bad.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is this stuff crucial to every physicist all of the time, regardless of their field?
No. It is crucial to be able to learn and understand new things quickly, but which areas you'll need really depends on the actual project.
Does it get better/more interesting?
Hard to tell, different people are interested in different things.
 
I'd say it will inevitably get more interesting. Physics II is so much more "magical" than Physics 1. Physics 1 IMO just mathematizes kind of obvious stuff about movement of objects. Physics II, I knew absolutely nothing about before I took it, and found than E&M is a truly beautiful subject. I chose to major in EE partially as a result of this class, (although the upperclassmen EE version of Electromagnetics wasn't nearly as captivating as the intro calc based physics E&M course).

I majored in EE but I probably should have majored in physics. I chose EE because it served as an "employable math degree" but I still feel pretty unemployable and probably should just not have been a wimp about it and done physics.
 
Last edited:
X89codered89X said:
I'd say it will inevitably get more interesting. Physics II is so much more "magical" than Physics 1. Physics 1 IMO just mathematizes kind of obvious stuff about movement of objects. Physics II, I knew absolutely nothing about before I took it, and found than E&M is a truly beautiful subject. I chose to major in EE partially as a result of this class, (although the upperclassmen EE version of Electromagnetics wasn't nearly as captivating as the intro calc based physics E&M course).

I majored in EE but I probably should have majored in physics. I chose EE because it served as an "employable math degree" but I still feel pretty unemployable and probably should just not have been a wimp about it and done physics.

Thanks. I've heard the same sentiment about E&M from a couple other people. I'm definitely looking forward to it and I suppose I will continue taking physics courses and see how it goes.
 
[Quadratic];4570609 said:
Thanks. I've heard the same sentiment about E&M from a couple other people. I'm definitely looking forward to it and I suppose I will continue taking physics courses and see how it goes.

If you like pop-science books and are decent at math, QM will blow your mind. I still can't believe it almost 20 years later!
 
analogdesign said:
If you like pop-science books and are decent at math, QM will blow your mind. I still can't believe it almost 20 years later!

My lab instructor invited me to sit in on his QM class next semester but I'm not sure my schedule will allow it. I bet it's awesome (and probably a little intense)! :)
 
Just going over old posts and curious if You're in physics 2 this semester.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K