Is lb per ft a unit of force or work?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
8 replies · 2K views
dangish
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
So in this engineering course I do at my university called Statics, we often use a unit of lb per ft as a unit of force when calculating moments.

However, I was just watching an episode of Big Bang Theory when Sheldon said something about a common mistake being when people use lb per ft as a unit of force and that it's rather a unit of work.

Can anyone confirm this and explain the reasoning behind it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're both wrong.

The unit lb per ft is for a distributed load. It's a force per unit length, not simply a force.

Work is a force multiplied by a displacement, so its units are ft-lb, not lb/ft.
 
ya I didnt mean lb/ft i meant to multiply them

so why would he say it was a unit of work, there must be some reason
 
I agree with vela - the unit of work in the English system is lb-ft. Could it be that you misheard the speaker?
 
dangish said:
so why would he say it was a unit of work, there must be some reason
What is the "it" you are referring to? ft-lb?
 
Nope its in the season finale of season 1, the only connection I can make is that work = force*distance which could also be a ft*lb
 
yes the it was referring to a ft-lb
 
Im not agreeing nor disagreeing with either of you, I was just curious as to what the guy on the show meant haha
 
dangish said:
Nope its in the season finale of season 1, the only connection I can make is that work = force*distance which could also be a ft*lb
That's pretty much it.