Is light pollution causing wasted energy and costing billions of dollars?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bobbywhy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the issue of light pollution, specifically its implications for wasted energy and associated economic costs. Participants explore the extent of light pollution, its environmental impact, and potential solutions to reduce energy waste from outdoor lighting.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant cites the International Dark Sky Association (IDA) claiming that 22,000 gigawatt-hours of energy are wasted annually due to outdoor lighting directed upwards, costing approximately $2.2 billion.
  • Another participant questions the characterization of light as "wasted," suggesting that light reflected off surfaces may not be considered wasteful.
  • Some participants propose that the issue of light pollution may self-correct due to rising energy costs, particularly in commercial and industrial settings.
  • Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of residential outdoor lighting in contributing to overall light pollution, with one participant suggesting its impact is minimal compared to other sources.
  • Participants express interest in the IDA's suggestions for reducing outdoor lighting waste, with requests for more details on these recommendations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the characterization of light pollution and its implications. While some agree on the economic costs associated with wasted energy, others challenge the notion of light being wasted and debate the effectiveness of potential solutions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall impact of residential lighting compared to commercial sources.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions of "wasted" light and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies may depend on specific contexts and assumptions about lighting practices.

Bobbywhy
Gold Member
Messages
1,734
Reaction score
52
Each and every photon of light we send upward into space at night pollutes the night sky and is wasted. This is excerpted from the Energy Brochure of the International Dark Sky Association (IDA):

“Wasted outdoor lighting, that shines directly upward, is estimated at 22,000 gigawatt-hours a year. At an average of $0.10 per kilowatt-hour the cost of that wasted energy is $2.2 billion a year. In terms of how that affects our carbon footprint, here’s the math:
• 3,412 Btu to generate one kilowatt-hour
• 1 ton of coal = 20.1 million Btu
• 1 barrel of oil = 5.8 million Btu
• 3.6 million tons of coal, or 12.9 million barrels of oil are wasted every year to generate the energy for this lost light.”
http://www.darksky.org/

Night lights map: http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~pesti/night/

For a detailed technical description of the light emitted upward into space see: http://laps.noaa.gov/albers/slides/ast/places.html

For very high resolution images of the night lights download the “hi res” images from:
http://www.lightpollution.it/worldatlas/pages/fig1.htm

The IDA offers simple suggestions on how to diminish the energy wasted in lighting the outdoors at night. The United States could save much energy and money by adopting more sensible lighting schemes. We would thereby reduce our need for foreign energy imports and decrease our carbon emissions footprint. Safety and security lighting would not be affected; only the light sent into outer space would decrease. And the night skies in all their splendor would become more visible.

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Bobbywhy said:
The IDA offers simple suggestions on how to diminish the energy wasted in lighting the outdoors at night.
What are these suggestions?
 
The wording in the OP is a little problematic: light reflected off the ground is not necessarily wasted, it is only light directed upwards.

So anyway, it turns out that the light pollution problem is largely going to mitigate itself due to the energy cost implications. On the commercial/industrial end, anyway: people still don't put much effort into it residentially.
 
russ_watters said:
... So anyway, it turns out that the light pollution problem is largely going to mitigate itself due to the energy cost implications ...

I'd say you got THAT right. For example, I've never seen parking lot lights that don't direct all of their light downwards by having reflectors above the bulbs. for that matter I don't think I've ever seen common street lights that direct any light upwards.

I don't argue that we might save a bit with residential outdoor lighting but it strikes me that as a percentage of all lighting in the US ... all commercial, residential indoor, and residential outdoor, it would be approximately zero. Does anyone think I have this wrong?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K