Is My Probability Mass Function Correct Given the MGF?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the correctness of a proposed probability mass function (pmf) derived from a given moment-generating function (MGF). Participants explore the representation of zero probabilities in the pmf, debating whether to include or exclude values with zero probability.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a pmf including a zero probability for the value 4, questioning if it is acceptable to state "0" for that value.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for a form that excludes the zero probability, suggesting it is clearer.
  • A different participant prefers the inclusion of the zero probability, arguing that it prevents confusion over potential typos in the representation.
  • There is a mention of typesetting preferences, with one participant suggesting that a zero probability should be explicitly shown as "0.0" for clarity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on whether to include zero probabilities in the pmf representation, indicating a lack of consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not resolved the implications of including or excluding zero probabilities in the context of clarity and potential confusion.

Tomp
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Question
A moment-generating function of X is given by M(t) = 0.3e^t + 0.4e^(2t) + 0.2e^(3t) + 0.1e^(5t)

Find the pmf of X

My attempt
x f(x)
1 0.3
2 0.4
3 0.2
4 0
5 0.1

I am just wondering whether it is correct to say "0" for 4 or is it more correct to say

x f(x)
1 0.3
2 0.4
3 0.2
5 0.1

or is either acceptable
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would prefer to see the second form.
 
I, on the other hand, prefer the first. I think if I were to look at the second I would wonder whether or not the "5" was a typo and "4" was meant. The first form makes it clear.

(Though my "inner typesetter" would prefer "4 0.0"!)
 
Typesetting preferences :)

HallsofIvy said:
I, on the other hand, prefer the first. I think if I were to look at the second I would wonder whether or not the "5" was a typo and "4" was meant. The first form makes it clear.

(Though my "inner typesetter" would prefer "4 0.0"!)

Understandable. My thought process was simple: in a small discrete distribution, if some integer value has probability zero, don't bother including it in a summary table.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K