Is my proof of Simon's line theorem complete?

  • Thread starter Thread starter disregardthat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Line
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a proof of Simson's line theorem involving a triangle inscribed in a circle and an arbitrary point outside the triangle. The original poster presents a detailed geometric argument with various angles and cyclic quadrilaterals, seeking feedback on the completeness of their proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants engage with the proof by questioning specific angles and points mentioned, such as the role of angle APX and the notation used. There are also comments about the use of software for geometric visualization.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing feedback on the proof's clarity and notation. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in terminology, such as the correct name of the theorem, and a participant expresses a desire to assist despite their own limited knowledge of geometry.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note confusion regarding specific points and angles in the proof, indicating a need for clearer definitions or diagrams. The use of Geogebra software is mentioned as a tool for visualizing the problem.

disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
I have written a proof of the simons line theorem. I would appreciate if someone would tell me if it's complete.

We have \Delta ABC inscrubed in a circle, and P is an arbitrary point that does not coincide with either of the corners of the triangle. (See attached figure).

Now draw perpendiculars from P to [AB], [AC] and [BC] which intersect with the lines in U, \ Y and Z respectively.

Let E be the point of intersection between [PU] and [AY].
Let T be the point of intersection between [AC] and [BP].

Let \angle BZP=\alpha and \angle APU=\beta.

Now as \angle BZP and \angle BUP are supplementary, BZPU is a cyclic quadrilateral \Rightarrow \angle PUZ = \alpha.

Now as \angle PAC subtend over the same arc as \angle PBZ, \ \angle PAC = \alpha \Rightarrow \angle UAR = 90 - (\alpha +\beta) \Rightarrow \angle ARU = \alpha + \beta \Rightarrow \angle PET = \alpha +\beta.

Let \angle UZB = \gamma \Rightarrow \angle UPB = \gamma.

As \angle CYP and \angle CZP are supplementary, CZPY is a cyclic quadrilateral \Rightarrow \angle CPY = \gamma.

As \angle PAY =\angle PUY, APYU is a cyclic quadrilateral \Rightarrow \angle UYA = \beta.

Now \angle ETP =180-(\alpha +\beta + \gamma) \Rightarrow \angle PTY = \alpha +\beta +\gamma \Rightarrow \angle TPY=90-(\alpha+\beta+\gamma)

Now as \angle BUZ=\angle BPZ and \angle BUZ=90 - \alpha, \angle BPZ = 90 - \alpha.
Let \angle CPZ= \mu. Now \angle CPZ+\angle TPC=\angle BUZ \Rightarrow \mu + 90-(\alpha +\beta)=90-\alpha \Rightarrow \mu = \beta \Rightarrow \angle CPZ = \beta \Rightarrow CYZ = \beta.

As \angle UYP+\angle PYZ = \beta +90 + 90-\beta = 180, U, \ Y and Z must be colinear.

QED

Thanks for any feedback.
 

Attachments

  • Simson line.JPG
    Simson line.JPG
    25.1 KB · Views: 538
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just bumping this... Hoping someone will take a look. I really appreciate it.
 
Where is \angle APX or rather point X.
 
I thought I had switched all the X's with U's as my program wouldn't accept X as a vertex. It's really U. It's changed now.
 
What program are you using?
 
Geogebra. It's great. It's free and our textbooks webpage has a link to it.

If you want it..: here is a direct link to the setup file.
http://www.geogebra.org/download/InstData/Windows/NoVM/GeoGebra_3_0_0_0_Release_Candidate_1.exe
 
Woah! This program is cool ... thanks! I wish I knew more geometry to help you, lol. I'm actually self-studying it at the moment, but you're further ahead of me in the game so :( I'm sure someone else will respond in a few!
 
It's supposed to be Simson's line, and not Simons line.
 
PZ is perpendicular to BC, then angle(BZP) is naturally 90 degree, no need for any assumption!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K