Is our future potential already coded in our DNA?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dleacock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the idea of whether the potential for human evolution is already encoded in our DNA. Participants explore concepts related to genetic mutations, the nature of DNA changes, and the implications for future evolutionary steps.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that future evolutionary steps could arise from either the activation of inactive genes or small-scale adaptations within existing DNA.
  • Others argue that significant evolutionary changes are likely to come from mutations, which they describe as "new information" in the genetic code.
  • One participant questions the notion of mutations as beneficial, pointing out that many mutations lead to negative health outcomes, such as cancer, and asks if any mutations can be considered good.
  • Another participant clarifies that mutations can be neutral, harmful, or beneficial, and emphasizes that beneficial mutations are essential for evolution, framing it as a random process with varying outcomes.
  • A participant expresses personal interest in genetics and discusses their struggles with physics, questioning the necessity of physics knowledge for a career in molecular genetics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of mutations in evolution and whether future evolutionary potential is predetermined by current DNA. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of mutations and their implications for evolution are not fully explored, and there is a lack of consensus on the relationship between DNA and future evolutionary potential.

dleacock
Hope this doesn't sound too silly, but I seem to recall hearing someone
say that our species future potenial, I guess our next evolutionary steps are already coded into the DNA. Now this doesn't seem to make to
much sense to me, but maybe its BS. Anybody ever hear anything like this?

dleacock
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Well, I suppose either (1) an inactive gene could become active or (2) there can be some small scale adaptation within an existing DNA code. But it seems like "next evolutionary steps" (sounds more substantial) for humans will come from mutations (new information)...unless you want to consider genetic engineering.
 
you refer to mutations as "new information" I was under the impression that a mutation is when the dna is not copied correctly somewhere along the line and is changed. I was under the impression that this is what causes bad things to happen to our body. isn't cancer a genetic mutation, along with a number of other fatal illnesses? is a genetic mutation ever good?
 
fileen said:
I was under the impression that a mutation is when the dna is not copied correctly somewhere along the line and is changed.
Mutation is just a change in the DNA sequence of a cell. This can happen due to a variety of causes...incorrect copying, external influences (like UV rays), etc. Mutations can be silent (i.e. they have no effect) or can be 'bad' or yes, even 'good'. It is like shooting at a crowd of people at random. Most of the times you will hit no one or hit an innocent person...but at times, by chance, you can hit a criminal too! :smile: But the importance of these random 'good' hits are they are the driving force of evolution.
This leads us to the OP.
our species future potenial, I guess our next evolutionary steps are already coded into the DNA
So what this means is that our current DNA content sets the constrains and the boundaries on how much we can evolve and in what directions because mutations can only occur in this given DNA content.
 
sounds like you know a lot about it. I am very interested in genetics and I actually just applied to a number of universities for their molecular genetics courses. the problem is my physics. I just don't like it. so far I am self taught in the area.I have done it all through correspondance courses and I am debating dropping my in class grade 12 physics class for next semester. I have the hardest time making myself do it. I found this forum in attempt to find help but funny as it sounds I have never even been to the physics part of this website. I understand it but I don't like it. one might say that it is simply due to my self teaching but I did chemistry the same way and my marks a 93, I love it. how much physics do you think I need to get by in genetics? I can do it but I would like to do as little as possible.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K