Is our perception of reality frequency based?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the hypothesis that human perception of reality is frequency-based, likening the universe to a radio spectrum where minds are tuned to specific channels. The conversation touches on the implications of this theory, including the existence of alternative realities and the possibility of changing one's perceived frequency. Participants reference Carl Jung's book "Synchronicity" and the Jung-Pauli letters as relevant literature, while also emphasizing the brain's nature as an electrochemical computer. The discussion invites further exploration into the concept of biological frequencies and the scientific basis for these ideas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts related to frequency and perception
  • Familiarity with Carl Jung's theories, particularly "Synchronicity"
  • Knowledge of electrochemical processes in the brain
  • Awareness of scientific discussion guidelines in forums
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of frequency in quantum physics
  • Explore Carl Jung's "Synchronicity" and the Jung-Pauli letters
  • Investigate the relationship between brain chemistry and perception
  • Examine theories on alternative realities and their scientific implications
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for psychologists, physicists, philosophers, and anyone interested in the intersection of consciousness, perception, and reality. It is particularly relevant for those exploring the implications of frequency theory in understanding human experience.

drakenw
I found this site via a google search for some key terms I was thinking about. Let me preface by saying I have never taken a physics class, and I am definitely no genius.

I formerly was an intelligence analyst in the military working with electronic signals, the concept that I'm now pondering only came to me within the past few years though.

What if our perception of reality is due to our minds being tuned into a specific frequency, and along with that all other minds, and objects are "tuned" into this frequency. I think of the universe kind of like a radio spectrum, withour minds being tuned into a specific channel. We can only perceive what we are tuned into. Therefore, if we're to think that everything that can happen, does happen at some point in time - could these alternative realities exist at even the most minute difference of frequency? If we were able to change the frequency of reality we perceive, would our world be different and if so, would we have any memories of the our previous perceptions? Do we naturally go in between different frequencies throughout the course of our lives? If there is any merit to this line of thinking, how could it be proved? By locating a resonate frequency of the universe perhaps? It couldn't a relative frequency emitted by all people, because as I see it - we are "listening" to the frequency, not necessarily transmitting. Perhaps these are just crazy thoughts, figured I would share though. Hopefully I've come to the right place.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
myself, i think thoughts are not electromagnetic in nature. Einstein's dad had an electromagnet factory so he was imprinted early-on to ponder that mysterious force and his thoughts set the tone for whole 20th century..

Brain is an electrochemical computer.

you might enjoy Carl Jung's book "Synchronicity" , and the Jung-Pauli letters on that subject. Just search on their names.

old jim
 
jim hardy said:
myself, i think thoughts are not electromagnetic in nature. Einstein's dad had an electromagnet factory so he was imprinted early-on to ponder that mysterious force and his thoughts set the tone for whole 20th century..

Brain is an electrochemical computer.

you might enjoy Carl Jung's book "Synchronicity" , and the Jung-Pauli letters on that subject. Just search on their names.

old jim

Thanks for the suggestions, I'll definitely seek them out.

I definitely can agree with your idea of the brain, which leads me to think there may be biological frequencies; for lack of a better term.
 
Welcome to Physics Forums!

It would be beneficial to read the overall PF rules, by clicking the Rules link at the top of any page here (in particular the Scientific Discussion Guidelines), as well the rules for this particular forum (Skepticism & Debunking), which are in the very first thread at the top of the forum, titled "New rules and guidelines..."
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K