Is Phenyl Shift Better Than Methyl Shift in Carbocation Rearrangement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NEILS BOHR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shift
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the preference for phenyl shifts over methyl shifts in carbocation rearrangements. Participants highlight that the phenyl group can stabilize the positive charge through resonance, which is not as effective with a methyl group. The context of the reaction significantly influences the stability of the resulting carbocation, particularly when adjacent to other groups. Ultimately, the stability of the transition state and the specific molecular environment dictate the preferred shift during rearrangement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of carbocation stability and rearrangement mechanisms
  • Familiarity with resonance and its effect on charge stabilization
  • Knowledge of transition state theory in organic reactions
  • Basic concepts of steric hindrance and its influence on reaction pathways
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of resonance in carbocation stability
  • Study examples of carbocation rearrangements involving phenyl and methyl shifts
  • Learn about transition state theory and its implications for reaction rates
  • Explore steric effects in organic chemistry and their impact on reaction mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and researchers interested in reaction mechanisms and carbocation stability will benefit from this discussion.

NEILS BOHR
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
why is phenyl shift better than methyl shift?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You did everything possible to ask the question that is impossible to answer.

In what context? Better for what?
 
:smile:

i mean whenever there's a possibility of the 2 happening , why is the former given more priority than the latter??
 
I'd say it's because a phenyl group has far more steric hindrance, so it'd be more "pressured" to shift.
 
NEILS BOHR said:
:smile:

i mean whenever there's a possibility of the 2 happening , why is the former given more priority than the latter??

I wonder if you are aware that your question is still ambiguous.
 
He's asking about carbocation rearrangement. Why is the phenyl group more likely to undergo rearrangement than the methyl group when both groups are present?

In the transition state, the alkyl and the phenyl group are both bonded in a similar fashion to the carbocation center. The phenyl group does something special with that positive charge that the methyl group cannot do as easily. Think about it some more.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lori_jolly
Its still case dependent.

If the carbocation is adjacent to a carbon bearing an alkyl and phenyl group, then the alkyl group (or hydride or what have you) would shift to place the carbocation in the benzylic position. A phenyl shift, in this situation, would not result in the most stable carbocation.

I would like to see an example of what the OP had in mind. I'm sure there are examples of what is being said here, but I was taught the complete opposite (unless I'm misunderstanding something here).
 
Yanick said:
Its still case dependent.

If the carbocation is adjacent to a carbon bearing an alkyl and phenyl group, then the alkyl group (or hydride or what have you) would shift to place the carbocation in the benzylic position. A phenyl shift, in this situation, would not result in the most stable carbocation.

Is that true? The transition state is a three centered bond that contains a positive charge. What can happen with a cationic charge associated with a phenyl group that isn't possible with a methyl group?
 
chemisttree said:
Is that true? The transition state is a three centered bond that contains a positive charge. What can happen with a cationic charge associated with a phenyl group that isn't possible with a methyl group?

I'm pretty sure you're talking about resonance but I'm not sure why the phenyl would shift instead of a methyl or hydride thus not allowing for that resonance stabilization to be present.
 
  • #10
What do you know about the stability of the transition state (and how that effects reaction rate) where the cation is further stabilized by resonance? How does a more stable transition state affect the Eact?
 
  • #11
:approve:

actually our sir asked this question

and we explained all the things we could ( talking about carbocation rearrangement as well)

but he didnt look to be approved of what we had to say!:rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K