NEILS BOHR
- 79
- 0
why is phenyl shift better than methyl shift?
The discussion centers on the preference for phenyl shifts over methyl shifts in carbocation rearrangements. Participants highlight that the phenyl group can stabilize the positive charge through resonance, which is not as effective with a methyl group. The context of the reaction significantly influences the stability of the resulting carbocation, particularly when adjacent to other groups. Ultimately, the stability of the transition state and the specific molecular environment dictate the preferred shift during rearrangement.
PREREQUISITESChemistry students, organic chemists, and researchers interested in reaction mechanisms and carbocation stability will benefit from this discussion.
NEILS BOHR said:
i mean whenever there's a possibility of the 2 happening , why is the former given more priority than the latter??
Yanick said:Its still case dependent.
If the carbocation is adjacent to a carbon bearing an alkyl and phenyl group, then the alkyl group (or hydride or what have you) would shift to place the carbocation in the benzylic position. A phenyl shift, in this situation, would not result in the most stable carbocation.
chemisttree said:Is that true? The transition state is a three centered bond that contains a positive charge. What can happen with a cationic charge associated with a phenyl group that isn't possible with a methyl group?
