Is R an Equivalence Relation on Functions to [0,1]?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
eXorikos
Messages
281
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Given is the set X. The set of functions from X to [0,1] we call Fun(X,[0,1]). On this set we consider the relation R. An ordered pair (f,g) belongs to R when [tex]f^{-1}(0)\setminus g^{-1}(0)[/tex] is a countable set.

a) Prove that R is transitive.

b) Is R an equivalence relation? Prove!

c) Prove that [tex]R \cap R^{-1}[/tex] is an equivalence relation.

Homework Equations


Transitive means that if (f,g) and (g,h) belong to the relation, that also (f,h) belongs to it.

Equivalence relation is a relation that is transitive, reflexive ([tex](f,f) \in R[/tex] and symmetric ([tex](f,g) \in R \Rightarrow (g,f) \in R[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution


a) [tex]f^{-1}(0)\setminus g^{-1}(0)[/tex] is a countable set. So [tex]f{-1}(0)[/tex] is a countable set. This means that [tex]f^{-1}(0)\setminus h^{-1}(0)[/tex], because a subset of a countable set is also countable.

Is this correct?

b) Reflexivity is easy, because [tex]f^{-1}(0)\setminus f^{-1}(0)[/tex] is the empty set so that is obviously countable.
How do I prove that it is symmetric?

c) Is this just the subset of all the reflexive pairs?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
eXorikos said:
a) [tex]f^{-1}(0)\setminus g^{-1}(0)[/tex] is a countable set. So [tex]f^{-1}(0)[/tex] is a countable set.
You can't conclude [itex]f^{-1}(0)[/itex] is countable. For instance, suppose X is R, the set of real numbers, and f(x)=g(x)=0. Then [itex]f^{-1}(0)\setminus g^{-1}(0)[/itex] is the empty set, but [itex]f^{-1}(0)=R[/itex], which is not countable.