Is the Axiom of Choice Necessary to Well-Order Finite Sets?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Csharp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of the Axiom of Choice in establishing a well-ordering for finite sets. It is concluded that finite sets do not require the Axiom of Choice for well-ordering, as demonstrated through induction on cardinality. The proposed method involves defining an ordering for k+1 based on the well-ordering of k, ensuring that every nonempty subset has a lowest member. This confirms that every total order on a finite set qualifies as a well-ordering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of well-ordering principles
  • Familiarity with induction in set theory
  • Knowledge of total orders and their properties
  • Basic concepts of finite sets in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Axiom of Choice in set theory
  • Explore induction techniques in mathematical proofs
  • Research the properties of total orders and well-orders
  • Examine examples of well-ordering in finite sets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of set theory, and anyone interested in the foundations of mathematics and the properties of finite sets.

Csharp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I want to show that there exists a well ordering for every finite set.

(I know if you add axiom of choice you can prove this theorem for infinite sets too but I think the finite sets do not need axiom of choice to become well ordered)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you tried using induction on the cardinality of the set?
 
Good idea.

Suppose that k is well ordered.

k+1= k U {k}

First of all I'll define an ordering on k+1.
If s and t are both in k then I use the ordering from k.
If one of s and t is k then k>s.

Suppose that S is a nonempty subset of k+1.
Then if it doesn't contain k it has a lowest member.
If it contains k then S-{k} has a lowest member which is also lower than k itself.
 
Csharp said:
I want to show that there exists a well ordering for every finite set.
Every total order on a finite set is a well-ordering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K