Is the Casimir Effect the Same for Insulators as for Metals?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the Casimir effect and whether it manifests similarly for insulators compared to metals. Participants explore the theoretical implications and distinctions between the two types of materials in the context of the Casimir force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the Casimir force would be the same if metal plates were replaced with insulators, noting that insulators are also neutral.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of the distinction between conductors and insulators, stating that the calculation of the Casimir effect relies on the fact that the electric field inside a conductor is zero.
  • A participant points out that their understanding of the topic is limited to high school physics, raising a question about whether the field inside an insulator is also zero.
  • Further clarification is provided that it is indeed the field inside a conductor that is zero, not inside an insulator.
  • A reference to another thread is shared, possibly for additional context or information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding the Casimir effect and its dependence on the type of material used. There is no consensus on whether the effect would be the same for insulators as for metals, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge varying levels of background knowledge, which may influence their understanding of the Casimir effect and related concepts.

spidey
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
Casimir says that there is a force between two neutral metal plates when they are close..suppose if we replace the metal plates with insulators,will there be the same casimir force? what is the difference? why casimir used metal plates,he could have used insulator also?i think insulator is also neutral...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, Casimir didn't "say" anything. He calculated. I think the distinction is important - theoretical physics is accomplished not by stringing words together in the right order, but through quantitative predictions based on solid calculations.

Second, it matters that the plates are conductors. The key to the calculation is that the field inside a conductor is zero.

Third, I think this uncovers a problem with learning physics from popularizations, which are written for people who have (maybe) had high school physics, but not much more. I was taught the Casimir effect half way through my second year of grad school: so we're talking 5-1/2 years of full-time study beyond where the book is pitched. This is a huge amount og material that's missing, and people are simply going to have to accept that any understanding that's missing this much background is going to be superficial.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Second, it matters that the plates are conductors. The key to the calculation is that the field inside a conductor is zero.

Yea..i have only high school physics knowledge..learning from internet..Isn't the field inside an insulator is zero?
 
No, it's the field inside a conductor that's zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K