Is the Cheerios Effect Analogous to Gravity?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter InquiringMind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion establishes that the Cheerios effect in milk serves as an analogy to gravitational attraction, highlighting the similarities and differences between the two phenomena. While both involve attractive forces, gravity is fundamentally linked to the curvature of space and time, unlike the static attraction observed in Cheerios. The conversation emphasizes that gravity operates through geodesics, where objects move along paths that appear straight, despite the influence of gravitational forces. This nuanced understanding clarifies the limitations of the Cheerios analogy when applied to gravitational physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational theory and general relativity
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetism
  • Familiarity with the concept of geodesics in physics
  • Awareness of surface tension effects in fluids
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of general relativity and spacetime curvature
  • Explore the fundamentals of electromagnetism and its forces
  • Study the concept of geodesics and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the effects of surface tension in fluids and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the interplay between gravity and electromagnetic forces will benefit from this discussion.

InquiringMind
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Is the warping of the fabric of space by masses, similar to the warping of the milk surface, that pulls those last few Cheerios together.:biggrin:

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT0dULSMN0W24-voWzcoG6Hc-mO3T9umA0jMpKiqjv1966fDr4DEA.jpg


images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS7I5oRQRWFgKD1XHZ7Ccq9V1Mo3l6EJzF30mJ94kSin1fK6wz_CA.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way Cheerios are attracted in a bowl of milk is actually a lot closer to how electromagnetic attraction/repulsion works. You can draw some parallels with gravity, and indeed, gravity works like a purely attractive version of electromagnetism to first order. But once you get into details, there are quite a few places where the analogy starts to break-down. Most importantly, gravity is related to curvature in space and time. Cheerios start to pull together even if they are static. There is a force pulling on them. Gravity requires motion. Granted, objects are moving mostly through time in all practical situations, but you still can't look it as just an attractive force. The objects don't actually experience a force, but rather continue in what appears to them to be a "straight line", called a geodesic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K