MHB Is the Definition of Absolute Value Always True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute
AI Thread Summary
The definition of absolute value states that |x| equals x when x is greater than or equal to 0, and |x| equals -x when x is less than 0. This allows for rewriting expressions without absolute values, such as |x - 3|. When x is less than 3, |x - 3| can be expressed as 3 - x, confirming that |2 - 3| equals 1, which is consistent with this definition. Conversely, for x greater than or equal to 3, |x - 3| simplifies to x - 3. The absolute value definition holds true across these scenarios.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
The definition of absolute value states the following:

| x | = x when x is > or = 0

| x | = -x when x < 0

I can use the above definition to rewrite expressions that do not contain absolute values.

| x - 3 |, where x < 3

If x < 3, then we can say that (x - 3) is less than 0.

So, -(x - 3) = -x + 3 = (3 - x).

Correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, for x< 3, |x- 3|= 3- x. For example, if x= 2, |2- 3|= |-1|= 1= 3- 2.

And, of course, if [math]x\ge 3[/math], |x- 3|= x- 3.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top