MHB Is the Endomorphism Ring of a Finite Dimensional Vector Space Dedekind Finite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2015
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the endomorphism ring of a finite dimensional vector space over a field is Dedekind finite. Participants share their solutions, with Opalg providing a correct resolution to the problem. Another solution is presented that employs a non-determinantal approach. The thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of endomorphism rings in the context of vector spaces. Overall, the discussion highlights key mathematical concepts related to Dedekind finiteness in linear algebra.
Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Here is this week's POTW:

-----
Prove that if $V$ is a finite dimensional vector space over field $\Bbb k$, then the endomorphism ring $\text{End}_{\Bbb k}(V)$ is Dedekind finite.

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly solved by Opalg. Here is his solution:

Choosing a (finite) basis for $V$, we can associate a matrix, and hence a determinant, with each element of $\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb k}(V).$

Suppose that $S,T \in \mathrm{End}_{\mathbb k}(V)$, and $ST = \mathrm{id}$. Then $\det(S)\det(T) = 1$ and so $\det(S) \ne0$. Therefore $S$ is invertible. It follows that $T = (S^{-1}S)T = S^{-1}(ST) = S^{-1}$. Hence $TS = S^{-1}S = \mathrm{id}$.

Here is also my solution, which uses a non-determinantal argument:

Let $n = \mathrm{dim}_{\Bbb k}(V)$. The ring $\rm{End}_{\Bbb k}(V)$ is identified with the matrix ring $M_n(\Bbb k)$ via the isomorphism $\Lambda : M_n(\Bbb k)\to \rm{End}_{\Bbb k}(V)$, $A\xrightarrow{\Lambda} (x \mapsto Ax)$. So it suffices to show $M_n(\Bbb k)$ is Dedekind finite. Let $A, B\in M_n(\Bbb k)$ such that $AB = I$. Then $BA = I$ if and only if $A$ is invertible. By way of contradiction, suppose $A$ is not invertible. Then there is a sequence $E_1,\ldots, E_s$ of elementary matrices such that $E_1\cdots E_s A$ has a row of zeros. Then $E_1\cdots E_s = E_1\cdots E_sAB$ has a row of zeros. This contradicts invertibility of $E_1\cdots E_s$. Thus $BA = I$ and consequently $M_n(\Bbb k)$ is Dedekind finite.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K