- 22,170
- 3,335
I think the first person to have a 100 thanks should be permanently banned from PF. It's not physically possible to have a 100 thanks so quickly, so he must be cheating.
Is the first member to reach 100 thanks cheating?
- Thread starter micromass
- Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
9 replies · 3K views
Discussion
- 22,170
- 3,335
dlgoff said:Careful micromass. I can click your post's "Thanks" button 100 times fairly quickly.
you wouldn't do that to poor micro, wouldn't you?- 22,170
- 3,335
dlgoff said:
* Thinks we should ban dlgoff *
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 4,458
- 3,266
But, but ... https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=4430957&postcount=3micromass said:
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 5,850
- 553
I'll do it if you don't dlgoff. Someone has to stop the menace that is micromass.
- 22,170
- 3,335
MathsWolf
May be micromass is right. someone with multiple account/(have large friend group) can easily do that. and It counts as cheating because in that way if (s)he post a crackpot idea then (s)he also get several Thanks.
inotyce
- 43
- 1
MathsWolf said:
We can count all anonymous free proxies as one if they come from non-trusted unknown institutes (but this seems like a challenge, likely too complex for a simple script to defy). I don't know the real meaning of Thanks button below each member name but it's nice to say so as well as to know I am thanked for my reply. 
A Good idea of a good manner.