Loren Booda
- 3,115
- 4
Is the I-beam still favored by structural engineers?
The discussion revolves around the preference of structural engineers for I-beams in construction. Participants explore the historical context, comparisons with other beam types, and the evolution of beam design. The conversation includes both technical aspects and humorous commentary.
Participants express differing views on the historical preference for I-beams versus H-beams, with no consensus reached on whether the I-beam is still favored or if its preference is a recent phenomenon. The discussion includes both serious and humorous contributions, indicating a mix of perspectives.
The discussion includes playful banter and may not strictly adhere to technical accuracy, reflecting a blend of serious inquiry and humor. Some assumptions about the evolution of beam design and preferences remain unexamined.

Loren Booda said:Is the I-beam still favored by structural engineers?
Oh come on, you missed a beautiful retort.Danger said:Yes, because the G-beam is too expensive to produce.![]()
DaveC426913 said:Where do you get your questions?
Do you close your eyes, flip open an Encyclopedia, and point?
![]()
Wow, all my life I though the I-beam was a infelicitous l-beam.Danger said:I thought that the I-beam was just a circumcised H-beam.
DaveC426913 said:Oh come on, you missed a beautiful retort. The I-beam is not "still" preferred, it is "only recently" preferred. The I-beam is actually an evolution from an earlier form, the H-beam.
Every kid learned in school that H came before I.
FredGarvin said:I try not to use I-beams too much. They annoy other drivers.