Is the molecular formula for sugar correct?

AI Thread Summary
The molecular formula for sugar is conventionally written as C12H22O11, following the Hill system which prioritizes carbon and hydrogen before other elements in alphabetical order. Alternative arrangements, such as H22C12O11 or O11C12H22, are not standard and do not convey the same chemical information. Similarly, sulfuric acid is correctly represented as H2SO4, with the hydrogen ions listed first due to its classification as an inorganic acid. While there are established naming conventions, exceptions exist based on historical usage, as seen in the case of ammonia (NH3). Understanding these conventions is essential for accurate chemical communication.
akerkarprashant
Messages
74
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
Molecular formula correction.
Is the following molecular formula for Sugar can be written as
H22C12O11 or
O11C12H22 or
O11H22C12 or
C12O11H22 or
H22O11C12
instead of C12H22O11?

Logically they can be written as mentioned above?

If Not, Why?

There can be many more examples similar to above.
 

Attachments

  • download (23).gif
    download (23).gif
    18 KB · Views: 221
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Thanks.

Another example could be for Sulphuric acid having molecular formula as H2SO4.

This can be SH2O4,O4H2S,H2O4S, SO4H2,O4SH2.

Thanks & Regards,
Prashant S Akerkar
 
Two totally different cases.

The molecular formula for saccharose is C12H22O11 in that order -- by convention: Alphabetical. Doesn't tell you all you need to know to reconstruct the molecule. For that the IUPAC name (horrible ! See 3.1.1 here) is intended.

Sulfuric acid contains a functional group SO42- and -- as an inorganic acid -- its name by convention starts with the hydrogen ions. Hence H2SO4

##\ ##
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrClaude, vela, sysprog and 3 others
Thanks.

Mostly the convention for Molecular formulas will be alphabetical based ?

Is there a good site which sets the rules for molecular formula naming conventions?

Thanks & Regards,
Prashant S Akerkar
 
Not really. You could try Googling 'Hill system' or 'Richter system formulas'. Or even simply 'Chemical formula'

And my 'alphabetical' appears to be too simple-minded. The Hill system has C, H and then alphabetical, the RIchter system is still quite relevant (e.g. for Beilstein !). See e.g. here

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog and akerkarprashant
Wait, so what about NH3?
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog, BvU and akerkarprashant
IUPAC colored books (never remember which one is which) are definitive source for conventions used. In some cases general convention says one thing, but common, well established names/formulas are allowed.

That's mostly for historical reasons, way too many names and conventions are well established, universally understood, but unsystematic.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes sysprog, pinball1970, jim mcnamara and 3 others
Here is one uncalled for, unprofessional opinion.

We usually put cations to the left and anions to the right (NaCl, K2S, etc.). This goes for covalent compounds, too, where we use oxidation numbers (SO2, H2S, etc). Exception ammonia, probably for historical reasons.
 
Back
Top